Archive for the 'Venezuela' Category

Poverty swallows Chavez despite the waste of petrodollars

April 10, 2005

Excellent
article on Venezuela in Spain’s La Vanguardia by Joaquim Ibarz
, he
definitely did his homework.

Poverty swallows Chavez despite the waste of petrodollars

President Hugo Chavez has one
hundred ideas a day. Some 97 are discarded as impractical, but the three
remaining ones can cost Venezuela
a lot of money, since they are aimed only at mediatic and political
repercussion, instead of economic return.

Hugo Chavez finances poverty
so that everyone depends on him
a Venezuelan entrepreneur of asturian origin, explains in a few words
the orientation of the revolutionary regime that is being implemented in
gradual fashion in Venezuela.

Financing poverty, without
creating wealth, is very costly to a State that in six years has not only spent
US$ 200 billion that have been received thanks to high oil prices, but has also
increased external debt (from US$ 22 billion went to US$ 27 billion) and
multiplied internal debt (In six years, from US$ 1.069 billion it became US$
13.5 billion). One has to add US$ 1 billion in a euro bond and a new issue of
some US$ 1.5 billion.

To prevent that the incumbent
President dilapidate oil income, the Macroeconomic Stabilization Find was
created destined to generate savings when the price of oil was over that one
fixed in the national budget. The differential would be reserved for when the
price went down; it was like insurance for junctures with fiscal deficits.
Chavez no only eliminated the Fund, but as if it were petty cash, he grabbed
the US$ 7 billion that had been saved up to 2002.

The increase in debt has
taken place in the middle of an oil boom. According to analyst Gustavo Garcia
Osio, what is happening with Chavez is the same that happened with the
management by Carlos Andres Perez and in the Government of Luis Herrera, when
public debt was multiplied in the middle of a spectacular rise in hydrocarbons,
whose bad consequences Venezuelans know well. When the price of oil moderated,
the debt became impossible to pay, which brought successive devaluations of the
Bolivar and a deterioration of public expenditures.

Chavez is repeating the same
errors of Perez and Luis Herrera, Chavez is a good exponent of the past he
denigrates so much
, says to La Vanguardia, economist Hugo Faria. According to this
Professor, Chavez shows great fiscal irresponsibility to finance the uncontainable
public expenditures, not only with petrodollars and an increase in debt, but
also with successive devaluations. The curious thing is that Chavez devalues
while his mentor Fidel Castro, thanks to the billion dollars that he receives
from Venezuela
in cheap oil, revaluates the peso. In all of America, local currencies
are revaluing with respect to the dollar, except in Venezuela,


No
country has managed to reduce poverty without sustained economic growth points out Farias.

A large part of today income is wasted on current expenditures looking for
electoral yields. Chavez said it very clearly: the money has to be spent with
political criteria, not an economic one. The purchase of Argentine bonds for
US$ 500 million is not advisable from an economic point of view, but it is from
a political point of view. Although the income from the petrodollars is huge,
the expenses are even bigger. Populism is expensive and there are many
interests, both internal and external, that have to be covered. Only part of
the expenditures goes through the official controls, the rest goes via parallel
paths, without much supervision.


The budget of the Ministry of Defense, which is higher than the Education one,
was increased with the boundless purchase of war material. Military
expenditures are shooting through the roof with the creation of a body of
reserves which is the equivalent to a parallel army, which must be composed of
hundreds of thousands of people. In the same manner, in the last few months he
has created five new Ministries, with the corresponding increase in payrolls.
The National Institute for Statistics (INE) has registered that between
February 2004 and February 2005 the public sector hired in the same period
227.201 workers, while the private sector only added 24.069 workers to its
staff.

Even though Chavez
devotes a good part of the oil income to assistance plans destined to those
that have the least, during his term, poverty has increased by 10.2 percentage
points. According to the President of INE, Elia Eljuri, when Chavez assumed the
Presidency the poverty index was 42.8%, while at the end of 2004 it has
increased to 53% (Non Government organizations raise it to 80% with 50% of the
population in extreme poverty)



Poverty is swallowing Chavez; he thought poverty could be reduced with subsidies and giving away money,
but only creating wealth can you combat poverty in a sustainable way. Chavez is
not concerned with generating growth. Because he thinks wealth is badly
distributed, he looks to eliminate inequality making everyone poor
as
manager Gustavo Nahmens tells us.

Creating wealth is not Chavez€™ priority. On the contrary, he seems intent in
destroying it. Instead of backing private initiatives, he harasses the private
sector, who he considers his enemy for having signed in favor of the recall
referendum. The populist policies of the Government, together with the lack of
confidence in the future of the country and to a tax policy that forces
companies to pay the VAT ahead of time-on the basis of measures set by the
State-provoked the fall of investment and the bankruptcy of many firms.
According to data from Fedecamaras, in the last six years half the private
companies have disappeared, which was followed by and increase in unemployment.

The high
price of oil, debt, the improvement in tax collection and the CD’s issued by
the Central Bank (by as much as US$ 5 billion) are insufficient to take care of
the expenditure race that Chavez is propelling. Despite the increase in income,
the fiscal deficit increases (US$ 9 billion)

The lack of administrative control and competence facilities corruption. A new
revolutionary elite has surged that moves from the poor barrio to live in the
mansions of exclusive areas. Despite the bad economic situation, there is a
waiting list in Venezuela
to buy high end cars, that only enriched Chavistas are ready to acquire.

Chaos in the financial
execution of public funds accentuated with the creation of a parallel financial
sector. Without much infrastructure and without experts who had his confidence,
Chavez created eight new banks-Bank of Women, Bank of the People, Bank of
Popular Housing, Bank of the Armed Forces etc.-which give out loans without
guarantees and without worrying about collecting. Delinquency in Venezuela
ranges between 8 and 10%, but that if these banks reaches 53%, despite their
recent creation, some have been refloated by the State up to four times.

Social programs under Chavez are
doubly costly, since they duplicate activities and function of already existing
institutions. In the poor barrios he created health clinics and centers with
Cuban doctors, but he is allowing the slow agony of the Social Security system
(Hospital and emergencies), cutting their budgets. All of it has a political
end. For Chavez, what was there before he got to power, does not work. The only
things that work are those he creates.
One of the measures that increased the popularity of the
Venezuelan President the most before the recall referendum was a network of
popular supermarkets known as Mercal-that offer foodstuffs at subsidized
prices. In some products, Mercal supplies 40% of what Venezuelans eat. Sugar,
flour, rice, beans, milk, oil, canned goods, pasta and other products enjoy a
direct subsidy (the difference between the purchase and the sale price) and an
indirect one when the price is not affected by operating and administrative
costs. The program is beginning to come apart at the seams: an increasing number
of foodstuffs are detoured to parallel markets at free market prices. The same
beneficiaries stockpile them, and sell them. Mercal confronts increasing
difficulties due to its management, commercial and financial contradictions.

Chavez is
imposing a barter economy. He gives oil in exchange for political support or
diverse products. To Castro’s regime he facilitates under advantageous conditions
some 80,000 barrels of oil a day, that Havana
pays for by sending 16,000 doctors sports trainers m advisors and agents of all
kinds. Given the good friendship n that Chavez maintains with Kirchner, he will
buy 500 million dollars of Argentine debt and sends crude in exchange for pregnant
calves. He exchanges with China
fuel oil for bicycles and tractors.

Thoughts on armies by Alberto Barreda

April 10, 2005

Alberto Barreda in today’s El Nacional (page A-12) expresses something
I have always believed in about the Venezuelan military, which becomes
even more important in the context of the new reserves and the
assymetric war:

“It it not an epistemological whim. The truth is that I can not stop
thinking that armies, in general, are symbols of backwardness in our
civilization, an expression of human misery, of the inability to face
and resolve differences in a different way. The history of humanity can
be a detailed registry of the adminsitration of violence, of its
controls, of its domination. Armies are the last powerful reresentation
of a kingdom that should by now be, more than anything, an antiquity.”

Chavez’ folly: The

April 10, 2005


President
Chavez continued raising the specter of an external enemy Friday. This strategy
of inducing fear and nationalistic feelings in the population is typical of
autocratic regimes that want to hide the failure of their accomplishments. In
this case, the Chavez administration has raised the fear of a US invasion
which is seldom mentioned explicitly but is referred to as the “asymmetrical
war”. The subject is brought up almost daily and is accompanied by the daily
mention of the military reserve, which has quickly grown from an already exaggerated
half a million men to two million in less than two weeks. The whole thing is
not only typical of autocrats, but it shows the military framework of Chavez’
mind.

This is a
folly that will cost money and effort and bring nothing to the Venezuelan
population but grief and wasted resources. Chavez’ folly is embarking Venezuela in a
terrible path attempting to create fears that exist only in Chavez’ mind. But
as usual, it will be the people, those same “people” that Chavez regularly
claims to love and care for that will pay and suffer for all of it.

On Friday Chavez
announced
that in the next few months there would be joint military exercises
between the armed forces and the civil population. About the only good thing he
said was that Otaiza was wrong in calling for the hate of the US, but Otauza
is still holding his post. Here, in his own words, Chavez defines the asymmetric
war and the folly he is embarking this poor country on:

“ Never in
100 years, that we recall, the thesis that is being considered that leads us to
think in military maneuvers that are not only military, but are
civilian-military has occured. The participation of the people in the defense of the
country, and in the promotion of the country, is essential in the asymmetric war
we are starting to focus on here”

“The
asymmetric war, in short, can be described as a war strategy that a contender under
inferior conditions uses to confront an enemy whose military forces openly surpass
their own, not only quantitatively but technologically. The asymmetry supposes
the application of non conventional tactics, like guerrilla war and terrorism,
with the purpose of wearing down the adversary: it is considered that the US
Army is involved in an asymmetrical conflict with the Iraqi resistance.”

“In an
eventual conflict, there will be various steps of defense; the first one will
be the structured armed forces, the second one, the organized reserve, and the
last, all of the people, in a sequence of retreats to the plains, the barrios, and
the mountains. With this the potential enemies that would think of invading Venezuela to appropriate
its oil richness “would leave with their tail between their legs.”

There you have it, direct from the madman’s mouth.

Pope John Paul II

April 8, 2005

Havn’t said anything about John Paul II’s death, because I don’t have
the skills needed to write a fitting tribute to the life of this
extraordinary man. I recommend this article
by Peggy Noonan for a perspective on the impact his visit to Poland had
in 1979 on that country and the fall of the Iron Curtain.

Is Venezuela the most conservative of catholic countries?

April 6, 2005

There is this table below in today’s USA Today about the attitude of  catholics in various countries to different issues:

Percentages saying the following are ‘never justifiable’

Catholic population

  Abortion Divorce Homosexuality Euthanaisa
Worldwide 46% 26%         51% 43%
USA 37% 7%         20% 31%
Spain 27% 11%         13% 21%
Argentina 66% 24%         39% 48%
Venezuela 71% 29%         63% 55%
Philippines 51% 40%         26% 45%
Germany 37% 16%         18% 28%
Mexico 67% 38%          49% 56%

Source: World Values

The interesting thing is that Venezuelan Catholics (the country is
90% Catholic) come accross in this poll as the most conservative of all
of the countries polled. While I am not that surprised at the high
rejection of homosexuality, since machismo and personal experience
ratify this number quite well, I am surprised at the high rejection for
divorce, in a country where divorce has been legal for over sixty
years. The other surprise to me is the rejection of abortion compared
to other countries. What I do find interesting is how similar we are to
Mexico, despite the many cultural differences between the two
countries.

Does this table imply that a Latin American “conservative” Pope
would have a strong effect on Venezuelans? I think it would depend more
on his personality than his beliefs. But in the end, none of these
issues is a “hot” issue in Venezuela anyway. No group is proposing
major changes in abortion, divorce, homosexuality or euthanasia.
People’s problem here are much more basic than that: Food, health care,
inflation and employment simply obliterate any thoughts on these other
social issues.

Lame press release by Foreign Minister on hate statements

April 5, 2005

The
Minister of Foreign Relations issued a
statement saying
that:


“It is a pity when authorities and officials of the Government speak of hate,
differences and negative matters between countries”

“The opinions of any person not authorized about matters of foreign
relations, should be considered as personal, without involving for any reason,
or involving or compromising the responsibility of the official or
institutional position..”

“..peace, solidarity, friendship, cooperation and justice are fundamental
values of our people”

“It does not correspond with this policy nor with deep feelings of the
people, any manifestation that may induce to animosity, discrimination and hate
against any people”

Sorry Ali, too lame, simply unacceptable, if those values are so important and deeply ingrained: FIRE HIM!

More on new identification sytem

April 5, 2005

The Head of the identification office says in today’s El Universal
that the new identification system will not be done by Cubans as had
been ratified by Jesse Chacón earlier. Instead, it will be done with
IBM equipment and Cuban technicians will provide advise on certain
specific points only. The Hyunday contract is being considered by the
Superem Court and the Government will have to pay that company if
theCourt rules against it.

Economic tidbits

April 5, 2005

-The Government will issue this week a US$ 1 billion issue of a new
bond which matures on 2025. It will have a coupon between 7.6% and 8.1%
and will be sold in Bolívars only to local investors. This is similar
to earlier bonds, which are nothing but a way to buy foreign currency
at a price higher than the official controlled rate, but cheaper than
the pararllel rate. This benefits mostly those that have lots of
Bolívars and speculators.

-After only four months in his position, President Chávez replaced the Head of the new Government telecom company CVG Telecom.

-Amuay refinery shut down by electrical failure will likely reopen on Friday, according to PDVSA

A picture of Spanish Colombian relations

April 4, 2005

From Kulander
via Publiuspundit:

No matter
what Chavez thinks, Spain-Colombia relations appear from this picture to be in
much better shape than Spain-Venezuela relations.

The anti- gringo hate campaign should not be taken lightly

April 4, 2005


I am a
little concerned that people don’t seem to be taking seriously Eliezer Otaiza’s
words about promoting the hate towards US citizens or “gringos”. With time, I have
learned not to take lightly anything said by Chavez and his cohorts. In this
particular case, there are many reasons to take it even more seriously, since
Chavez in his Sunday program yesterday talked
now about
2 million reservists in order to “defend together with the people
the sovereignty and greatness of this land” adding later “the best way to avoid
war is to be prepared for it”. Thus, it is not Otaiza’s fertile imagination
which is thinking war, but it is a line of thinking that in my mind, comes all
the way from the top.

This is
all being accompanied by an amazingly irresponsible purchase of weapons of all
sorts at a huge cost to the country, rather than spending these funds social
programs or making the economy grow. This shows once again that the people are
not the priority, despite what the “revolution” claims. Venezuela is
buying boats, planes, rifles, bullets and uniforms in quantities never before
seen in its history. This is a path typical of non-democratic and autocratic
leaders. This is typical of the type of fear societies created by autocratic
leaders like Chavez, who in the words of Natan
Sharansky
“do not depend on their people; their people depend on them”.

You need
force and an external enemy to encroach a fear society, so that people will
always justify their hardships on the presence of an external enemy. This
actually provides internal stability. The formula is old (Think Castro!) and
Chavez is following it to the last detail. While Venezuela
will hopefully never go to war with the US, Otaiza’s proposal represents
the type of immoral campaign that autocratic regimes start in order to justify
what can not be justified: create an invsible, external enemy that will cretae sympathy for the autocrat.

Otaiza may
have been a stripper, but I am sure that what he says has been discussed by
Chavez and his advisers in private. Even Petkoff in today’s Tal Cual,
translated below, takes this lightly and points to the reaction by the
President of the National Assembly yesterday as an example. However, Maduro is not
part of that inner circle of former military startegists. Maduro does not share
the same military mind of Chavez’ close circle. Otaiza does. Anyone with a true
democratic mind would not even be considering the possibility of a war, least
of all the immoral promotion of hate against any national group. But these guys
are doing it. Otaiza will remain in his Government position, because what he
said does not offend Chavez, in fact, I am sure it started with the President
himself.

Otaiza was
Chavez’ intelligence Chief and has been moved to other positions of importance.
He followed Chavez’ own brother as head of the supposedly “all important” Land
Institute. He has Chavez’ trust, he is part of the inner circle. Don’t take his
words lightly, had they offended Chavez’ sensibility, he would have removed him or scolded
him. Neither of these has happened and I doubt either will. This
is part of the society of fear they are turning Venezuela into. They have already
taken us for a much longer ride than any of you thought possible.

I guess
Petkoff does disagree with me, as do most of the readers in the comment
section. You have been warned!



How can
Otaiza have a position of responsibility?
by Teodoro Petkoff

The truth
is that nobody who is deemed sane can take Eliezer Otaiza seriously. His latest
intellectual feat, that probably left his brain fired, was that one of
proposing that Venezuelans devote their time to hate the gringos, can not be
taken but as a ravings by someone that is not in his right mind. The only thing
missing was for him to propose the daily “two minutes of hate” that Orwell painted
in his famous “1984”. In this sense this mini-reporter, at least, will not
devote more than nine written lines that he has written up to here about that
demential rhetoric. But, on the other hand, this should be a lesson for Chavez.
Each time that he releases one of those calculated extravagances or he lets
loose one of his outlandish occurrence, product of his verbal incontinence, he should
take into account that among his supporters there is more than one guy with a
softened brain, that takes it seriously and believes this is a directive. You
see around, as an example, a bunch of nuts, civilians and military, talking
about the “asymmetric war” theme, for which amazingly, the first premise they
postulate is that our Armed Forces would be swept in two days by the yanqui
invader. Not without reason, Nicolas Maduro (President of the Assembly), in an
interview for El Universal yesterday, asked the reporter, laughing, not to ask
him about “that”. “That” was Otaiza’s interview.

He
probably felt someone else’s shame