Of labels and ramblings

March 8, 2006


As the
charade about the nominating committee for the Electoral Board continued today,
both pro-Government and anti-Government media seemed to concentrate their
efforts in measuring things by whether the people nominated are or not in the
Maisanta database, which according to them gave a 50% split for that committee. Maybe we should also publish their
tax records, pay stub, sexual preferences, kid’s pictures and wife’s pictures,
as well as having an opinion from the religious or military counselor and/or
psychiatrist published. That way we can really invade everyone’s privacy and fully violate thier rights once and for
all.

Let’s go ahead and put a label on everyone in the country, that will guarantee we will never
get along, ever, which will surely help the future of this poor
nation. Hey! We could even make it quantitative. One could say, for example, so
and so is 86.5% Chavista according to the new and improved Maisanta database. Or
how about: we can not hire this guy, he only rates 66.3% for the opposition
according to Maisanta 8.0.01i. I can even imagine this one: He can share in the profit in this shady deal, he has a 92.3% Chavista rating. Maybe people could have their rating stamped in their ID card!

I guess
all I can really say is that I am happy a physicist with a Ph.D. that I know
made the committee. I know that physicist are well trained to make decisions
and I know he is fair and competent. So, I rate the committee as 10% OK, 90%
unknown, for whatever is worth.

I did read a positive thing today in one of the local papers, which had this quote:

“Nothing
is as dangerous as to allow the same citizen to remain in power for a long time,
because people will get used to obeying him and he will get used to ruling them;
from which tyranny and usurpation originate”

Now, that
is one Simon Bolivar (who now our President claims was a zambo) quote you will never hear Chavez ever saying in public.


Autonomy proposal brings out the worst in Chavista leaders, including their non-democratic ideals

March 6, 2006

Signs like the one below have been seen around Zulia state, mostly Maracaibo, for quite at least six weeks:

(It says: YES to the autonomous status, NO to socialism and enough of leftwings. It’s own course for Zulia)

I had heard about the signs, but it was not until yesterday in El Nacional that I saw them and read the story about the group that wants to hold a referendum on the region’s autonomy. The group is not secessionist; it wants to hold a referendum to create an autonomous region or state in the same sense that some Spanish provinces are autonomous. They want to distribute the founding document and hold a referendum late this yearb. Essentially, they consider that Zulia State has contributed and inordinate amount of the resources of the Nation (Lake Maracaibo is in Zulia State) but een commensurate witthe treatment given to the region by the Central Government. According to a politician from Zulia, the State contributes 31% to GDP, but receives only 2% of the budget. I have not looked into this, but the first number looks high and the second one seems low, but it is true that Zulia has given more than it has received and continues to do so. But this is not a new claim. For decades, the state has felt that it has not received its fair share of the Government’s resources, which coupled with the strong regional identity of the inhabitants of that state has always led for calls for “La Republica Independiente del Zulia”.

Now, my personal opinion is that I would be against the separation of Zulia from Venezuela and I have not seen the proposed autonomy bylaws to see if it makes sense or not, or if I would be for it or against it. But I am amazed by the Government’s reaction from Chavez on down. This is, after all a democracy, but they all seemed to have forgotten about it, because they live in their own autocracy:

-First, there was Chavez himself, not only threatening that no state would separate from the Nation, but saying that the US was behind this conspiracy (number 9,878 and counting) and Governor Manuel Rosales was behind it, despite the fact that the group Rumbo Propio para El Zulia clearly says they have nothing to do with Rosales and in fact, they are all former members of COPEI, which is and was far from where Rosales stands politically.

-Then, there was the Chavista Deputy from Zulia State, Head of the Finance Committee of the National Assembly in today’s El Nacional threatening that the Government and the Armed Forces would not allow for any referendum to decide the autonomy of the region to take place.

This was followed by MVR Deputy William Lara in his customary Monday press conference, blaming the US Ambassador for the proposal and calling for an investigation of this “group” threatening sovereignty. But he was late to the party as the Prosecutor General had already given a press conference saying that his office had already opened an investigation into this “group” to determine if they had committed crimes against the Nation and its “territorial integrity”.

This whole thing simply is one more amazing case which reveals the autocratic and perverse Chavista logic, which makes anything that they do not agree with, simly illegal, even if it was the Chavistas themselves which introduced the referendum into the Venezuelan Constitution. Thus, it would appear to be perfectly valid and legal, even if I disagree with it, for any group calling for the region and the country to vote on a referendum on this question. It represents no threat to the Nation, it should not be illegally blocked or stopped by anyone except in the ballot boxes and in no way violates any known law.

In fact, it seems as if the only integrity that is being violated is that of the Constitution itself, which is sidestepped, trampled and violated at each step by this autocratic Government and, in this particular case, it is simply being ignored by the same group that wrote it. (One of the leaders of Rumbo Propio says the CNE refuses to accept papers for a referendum on the issue, I have no idea whether this is true or not)

In the end, it actually makes you wonder: What are they really afraid of? Why not let the issue be decided by the people? Whatever happened to Chavez’ claim that he did not believe in a representative democracy but in a participatory democracy where the people directly made all of the decisions? I suspect that this group may have been quite clever by coupling the autonomy issue with a vote on Century 21 Socialism, maybe Chavez will need to explain what the hell that stands for. And taht woudl be scary, sinec nobody seems to knwo what it stands for.

Let Rumbo Propio gather the signatures required to put the question to the voters. If they manage to get them, then let’s hold a referendum and follow its results. After all, this Bolivarian Democracy was based on a referendum which appeared nowhere in the laws of the Nation or its Constitution, but the Supreme Court in its “wisdom”and backed then by Chavismo, ruled that power ultimately resides in the people and that it was them that could decide on the Constituent Assembly.

It is no different now. Neither the Army, nor the National Assembly, nor the President should or can stand in the way of the possibility of legally holding such a referendum. Their reaction today simply shows their desire to perpetuate in power and how much they despise the very own democratic rules they created. Power does indeed reside ultimately on the people. That is what democracies are about, but these guys are not democrats, they just want the power.


I am back, missed only some incredible displays of bad taste

March 5, 2006

I am back after a very restful vacation where interent access was not easy thus keeping me away from the realities of the world. I guess I did not miss very much, except for the two incredible displays of bad taste below.


Venezuelans.- The proudest people on earth?

March 5, 2006

The National Opinion Research Center of the University of Chicago
published the results of a global survey about pride in 33 countries in
the latest edition of the International Journal of Public Research.
Surprisingly, Venezuelans scored the highest in general pride, Americans
were second. In the domain specific pride questions though, the
Americans beat the Venezuelans, that were second this time.

I have not yet downloaded and read the paper, I am planning to do so in
between Miguel’s vacations.

Meanwhile, you can read the details in the University of Chicago Chronicle.

Jorge Arena

The Devil’s scholar and favorite ghost blogger

http://arenaspace.blogspot.com

http://chavezfortheun.blogspot.com


The Chavistas are in Washington and the dissidents send their views.

March 4, 2006

A group of Chavista personalities are having a three day meeting this
weekend in Washington to coordinate a national solidarity network
with Chavez’s goverment in the US. The news about the event can be
found here.

and the program can be found here.

There will be two days of conference and the last day will be dedicated
to the Chavistas lobbying of members of Congress.

As a protest for the Chavez’s sponsored event, The Standup for Venezuela
Democracy Project is organizing a signature campaign to send a letter
to your member of congress so that he/she gets the other view of what
is happening in Venezuela.

If you are a US resident, a US citizen or a Venezuelan currently living
in the US , you can sign a petition here.

It is important that you know what is your US Congressional district. To
get the information, access this link.

Jorge Arena
Favorite ghost blogger


*Why being a journalist in **Venezuela** is becoming a dangerous line of work. *

March 4, 2006

Marcel Granier, the director of RCTV had a hearing yesterday in front of
a National Assembly Committee. You can know more about it reading
Daniel’s latest post.

However, there is one detail that I have not seen anywhere except in
today’s El Nacional that shows the dangers of being a member of the
non-official Press in Venezuela. Here is the link:

According to El Nacional, after the hearing, Granier had to be escorted
out of the building by the National Guard because a Chavista crowd was
waiting for him outside. The reason being his recent declarations
questioning President Chavez. The majority of the crowd were middle age
women that were chanting slogans and menacing to burn all private media.

Even though Granier was able to get unharmed out of the ambush, other
journalists were not so lucky. Yaradis Adrián of Televen and Francia
Sánchez of RCTV were KICKED by the crowd and their technicians were
pushed. The team of Globovision was luckier. Journalist Ruth Villalba
commented that one of the cameraman was told what was happening outside
and they decided to get out of the building through the basement that
communicates with another building.

Meanwhile the journalists of VTV (official media) were applauded when
they got out of the building.

Reporting from cyberspace where the angry ladies cannot kick me,

Jorge Arena

Distinghished cyber ghost
http://arenaspace.blogspot.com

http://chavezfortheun.blogspot.com


Scanning Chavista News

March 2, 2006

Those that have read my ghost posts know that my favorite sources of
news are the official sites. I personally think that the MINCI is hard
to beat, but lately I have had a great time reading ABN, VTV and RNV.
Aporrea is also a must read.

So let’s see what were the official news today (March 1’st , 2006):

The big news today at the MINCI and VTV was that the school of Samba
Vila Isabel, the one that got the financial backing from PDVSA, was
nominated as the Champion of the Rio Carnival (see here and here)

The name of the “comparsa” was “Soy loco por ti”, which I do not know if it is
Portuguese or bad Spanish for “I am crazy about you”(in Spanish it
should be said “Estoy loco por ti”). They had a huge (12 meters) and
very tacky Bolivar image holding a heart in his right hand.

Funny that Bolivar’s face is, with time, progressively looking more and
more like Chavez’.

But a descendant of Simon Bolívar, a witty 89 year old, was not amused
at all by the way the image of her great great uncle was being deployed.
She said she wanted to complain about it, but does not know exactly to
whom because all the official Bolivarian (in the original sense)
entities are being taken over by the Chavistas (see Tal Cual, March 1^st
, page A6).

From Aporrea today we learned that,
according to a North American Polling company called “North American
Opinion Research Inc.”, 6 out of 10 Venezuelans are going to vote for
Mr. Chavez. Aporrea specifies that the company has its headquarters in
Pennsylvania and has been installed in Venezuela since 1997.

Pretty impressive, isn’t it? After seven years of Chavismo, 60% of
Venezuelans are still willing to vote for Chavez again!

It is, indeed, pretty impressive, unless of course you happen to be a
frequent reader of Vcrisis

Surprise, surprise, this is the same polling firm that says that 78% of
Venezuelans trust the CNE! . And this
also happens to be the company that accurately predicted the 2004
Referendum Results!… Only that in 2004 it
was not a Pennsylvania based but a Delaware based company.

Interestingly, cyber sleuth Alek Boyd, discovered that no company with
that name was registered in Pennsylvania or Delaware but that a company
with that name was instead registered in Florida.

Surprise, surprise again, Alek also discovers that the company’s Miami
address is shared with a Venezuelan based company, called Petrotulsa,
that is related to the oil business. By one of those amazing chances,
Petrotulsa also shares office in Venezuela with the North America
Opinion Research Inc. company we were first talking about. The story
gets more and more convoluted and Alek tracks the directors of the firm
and finds some interesting connections that point to a Maracaibo family.
A real Boyd thriller. Read all about it here.

And all this amazing information just by reviewing some Chavista news.

Who said the official sites were boring?

Reporting from Cyberspace,

Jorge Arena
Distinguished ghost blogger

http://www.arenaspace.blogspot.com

http://www.chavezfortheun.blogspot.com


February 26, 2006

Announcement to the people in BOSTON

Venered and Forum Venezuela are cordially inviting you to join

Javier Corrales, /Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst
College / for a talk on

CHAVEZ AND THE RISE OF COMPETITIVE AUTHORITARIANISM

Opening remarks by Ricardo Hausman, /Director of the Center for
International Development of the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard
University /

Wednesday, March 1, 2006, 6:30 p.m.

STARR AUDITORIUM
/Belfer Center Building
Kennedy School of Government/

For directions to the Belfer Building:

/http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/main/directions.htm
/

Short Bio of Javier Corrales:

/http://www.amherst.edu/~jcorrale/aboutme.htm
/

Short Bio of Ricardo Hausmann:

/http://www.ksghome.harvard.edu/~rhausma/bio..htm
/


Carnival calls

February 24, 2006

I will be going away for the Carnival holidays. I am not sure whether I will have efficient access to the Internet where I am going. In any case, Jorge Arena, star ghost blogger, will be ready to fill in when necessary and hopefully I will have some sort of connection with the world. If not, take care and if you are in Venezuela or any other country that does celebrate Carnival, enjoy yourself, rest, and as we say here, don’t do anything I would not do. This gives you ample room for action!


A new list, or is it two?

February 24, 2006

The distinguished President of the National Assembly’s comittee on the family, women and youth sent the Heads of all public institutions a letter asking that they collect signatures for a petition entitled “For Life and Peace, no to the war in Iraq” demaninding from the US Government that the invasion of Iraq cease. This petition includes the name and ID number of those signing as well as their signature.

The petition is being circulated in earnest in public offices where people are being told, in no uncertain terms taht they are expected to sign this, whether they agree with it or not. The petition will be handed in to the US Ambassador at a demonstration agaisnt the war in Iraq that will take place on March 8th.

Thus, once again teh rights of Venezuelans are being violated by pressuring them into signing something they may not agree with. Moreover, there is an implied threat that if they do not sign it will be notes.

Thus, one wonders whether two new lists will arise from this petition:

One, the list made by the Chavez Government of those that refused to sign against the Empire and Mr Danger.
Two, the list the US Governmnet will have of those that are against it, which according to the Patriots Act may be a reason to not allow you into the US under any circumstances.

Not a pretty picture…