A Prof. From Princeton and two from John Hopkins have done a calculation similar to that by Elio Valladares that I posted yesterday. Their conclusions are found here in English and while they are very similar quantitatively to Elio´s they differ in their conclusion.
They did a very similar calculation to Elio´s. but 1238 simulations only, compared to the 10,000 Elio did. Their results are very similar, they found the distribution had an average of 360.90 for the Si coincidences and 317 for the No coincidences. This means that the occurrence of the No ones is reasonable, but the one for the Si coincidences is less likely.
However, the authors feel comfortable that 2.3 standard deviations away from the mean are feasible and thus feel this proves little. Elio´s results are much more conclusive, it is unclear if it is because he made almost eight times more simulations, but in the interest of discussion and comparison, here are the results.
I continue to believe that simulations at the Center level would be more conclusive than these, as there seems to be a high concentration of coincidences at the center level.
The Devil's Excrement 
Leave a comment