Once again, the revolution denies the poor basic property rights

August 1, 2006


Via Veneconomy I learn
that the Government finally issued the Law that will regulate the holding of property
in what is called “working class urban settlements” (read barrios). Unfortunately,
once again, the populist Government of Hugo Chavez fails to deliver on the most
basic rights and needs of the poor, taking away from them the right that could
do the most to help: The right to own the property in which they live.

Much like
the infamous land Bill, in which the Government abrogated itself the power to
expropriate and take over land as it wishes, but never gives back the ownership
to the peasants that work it, the urban settlement bill, fails to give title to
the property to its occupants, giving them only the right to live in it under
the so called “title of permanence” and in the name of the general good. 

Ironically,
it has been only the Primero Justicia party that had been actually
giving out
title to the property in barrios in which that party has Mayors,
while now the revolutionary and populist party of Chavez, fails to give the people
the same property rights. How screwed up can this country be when this goes
unnoticed by the Chavista adorers?

Much like
the case of the land bill, this is really bad news for the poor of this
country. Without having title to the land, none of the occupants of these
properties in the barrios will be able to obtain a loan for home improvements,
let alone a mortgage. In fact, Venezuelan labor laws allow workers to withdraw
severance pay in advance for home improvements on their own house, but this is
restricted to property legally owned by the occupants. In the case of the Land
Bill, this has been one of the biggest difficulties of the so called Fundos
Zamoranos, where the peasants have been unable to obtain financing for their crops
which combined with the absence of technical aid, has driven the farmers to
leave the properties given to them to work.

The whole
thing is really perverse. In the name of the socialist nature of the
revolution, people are being denied the right to property, which is guaranteed
by the Constitution. Thus, the words of the Constitution are stepped over by
the Government which in the end adjusts its projects not to the Constitutional
guarantees, but to the whimsical nature of Chavez’ continuously evolving
revolutionary project.

Meanwhile,
the leaders of the revolution continue to add to their inventory of property, whether
they are farms, like those of Chavez’ relatives and many retired military, boats,
apartments in the East of Caracas, where they drive fancy cars (and even have accidents in
them) as civil service salaries at the top now reach a historically unheard of
500 times the minimum salary. Thus, much like in other “revolutionary”
processes in history around the world, a new wealthy oligarchy has already been
formed on the back of, and in the name of the poor. Meanwhile the poor are
simply denied their property rights in the name of the collective nature of the
revolution.


Rayma strikes again

August 1, 2006

Is this the line for American Idol?   No, it’s the one for aspiring Presidential candidates


Does Rosales have to resign or ask for a leave to run?

July 31, 2006

Last Friday the Supreme Court ruled that Hugo Chavez did not
need to leave his position in order to campaign for the December election. The
press has interpreted the decision as suggesting that Manuel Rosales will have
to resign, but legal experts suggest that the interpretation is incorrect and
that Rosales simply has to step down temporarily.

The decision by the Court notes that Art. 229 of the
Constitution establishes that you can not be elected to be President while you
are Vice-President, Minister, Governor, or Mayor on the day you register to
run. However, the Court then uses Article 124 of the Suffrage Law which states
that to be candidates for President those holding public positions have to
resign (defined as absolute absence), but then goes on to explicitly say that
those that have to resign are “the Ministers, Heads of Central Offices of the Presidency,
Heads of organizations with functional autonomy, Presidents and Directors of autonomous
institutes and Presidents and Directors of state enterprises.

Thus, Governors are not explicitly included in the article,
which many lawyers believe means that Rosales has to ask for a leave of absence
of no longer than 90 days in order to run for President. (The law does separately
define an absence of more than 90 days as absolute)

The only part that remains unclear to me is how Rosales can
run without losing the Governorship if he would have to register his candidacy
90-plus days before the election. Any lawyers out there?


Weil and Deja Vu all over again…

July 31, 2006

A picture named weil111.jpg


Some nice flowers

July 30, 2006

Above left, Laelia (now Sophronitis) Purpurata Striata, I dropped it as I took it to take the pictures and it tore on the left petal. I loved those purple lines in the petal as well as the lip. Top right: I think it is Oncidium Lanceanum, but some details are different.. Will keep looking, I know it is related. I don’t like the way the picture looks either, I have to angle the screen to have it look right. .

Above left, Slc. Lulu, this is a seedling, first time it flowers. On the right another species Dendrobium Formosum, one of the largest flowers for these species.


I see fingerprint machines in our future

July 30, 2006


El Nacional reports today
that the President and Vice-President of the CNE Tibisay Lucena and Janeth Hernandez consider the use of fingerprint capturing machines “indispensable” because these machines guarantee the principle of “one man, one vote”. This position is also backed by the people on the technical side of the CNE who not only supprt the idea, but are already preparing a purcahse order for Cogent Systems of some 1,500 to 4,000 machines. The problem at this point is that there has been no decision on the matter, as the other three members of the Board have not said explicitly how they would vote, so the issue has not come to the table. What is known, is that most major opposition candidates have said that they refuse to have conditions that are worse than in the 2004 Assembly elections, where the fingerprint capturing machines were not used. Thus, it is likely that they would withdraw if the machines are present, except for El Conde and a couple of more.

What is interesting, is that there is no technical stiudy to back up even the use of these machines, let alone the expenditures. Venezuela uses indelible ink on the pinkie finger as a way of guaranteeing that there would not be people voting twice. Thus, the only possibility is if the poll monitors ignore the ink. In the past estimates of the percentage of people voting twice have shown that this is very insignificant, with other problems such as tally manipulation being much more important. But the worst part is that the CNE has never revealed any technical information about the use of the fingerprint machines in the three elections where they were used. It is not even known whether the system worked in real time to stop anyone from voting twice or how many people actually tried it, or even if whether they were accepted or not.

Thus, our electoral authorities have spent over US$ 100 million on a system that is feared by the people, but that nobody outside the CNE has any idea as to whether it even does the job, whether it is necessary or even if it has worked properly. Moreover, theer was no bidding process, Cogent was handpicked by former CNE President Jorge Rodriguez.

The whole thing is simply a charade. It is the fear induced in the people with the fingerprint machines that makes them a technical imperative. It is once again the abuse of the people’s rights by creating this aura of the violation of privacy of the voters with the machines, that makes them so useful to the autocracy. People have no idea if the Government can tell how they voted, but the fear instilled in them is such, that if the machines are present, many would prefer to stay home. Another generous and Machiavellic “gift” of the perverse revolution.


Ramirez threatens to cut oil supplies to the US, but Ambassador says there is no threat

July 30, 2006

Letter from Venezuela’s Ambassador Bernardo Alvarez yesterday to the US Senator Ruchard Lugar:

“There is no threat to cut oil supplies to the US”

Minister of Energy and Oil Rafael Ramirez
today in Iran:

“If the US wants to have a hostile policy towards us, then we will cut oil exports to that country”

I wonder what Alvarez understands as a threat?


Governmenet by revenge and retaliation, not by law

July 29, 2006

The Venezuelan Vice President showed the true colors of this autocracy when he said today that everytime there is an attack on any leader of MVR, the Government will “expropriate thousands of hectares in retaliation”.

So, Venezuela will from now on be ruled by the Law of the Jungle, with a Government acting on the basis of revenge and retaliation, ignoring the law and doing whatever it wants.

Hold it! Isn’t that what has been happening in the last few years anyway? I guess they are taking off their mask by now and simply saying in public what they tell each other in private everyday. Ask Sumate, Primero Justicia, the media, General Francisco Uson, General Carlos Martinez, Carlos Ayala, Henry Vivas, Lazaro Forero, Ivan Simonovis, as well as those killed and injured by this Government’s repression and disregard for human rights.


Ahora Venezuela belongs to…

July 29, 2006

Yesterday Moody’s announced that it was withdrawing the credit rating of PDVSA because it lacked information about the financial and operating state of the company. This is the revolution, after spending years saying that PDVSA was not transparent, they have turned it opaque. The slogan that now PDVSA belongs to everyone or the people is simply as hollow as we knew it would be.

By the way, the Reuters article says that PDVSA turned in the 2004 financials to the SEC in mid-2006. This is incorrect, PDVSA announced that it was doing it, but it has failed to it so far, as any check of the SEC Edgar database shows.

Amazingly enough, PDVSA responded by saying that they will send Moody’s any needed information and that they never recieved any request for information. Of course, they failed to mention that they did not comply with their legal obligation to turn in the 2004 financials by the three deadlines and extensions established by the SEC. These are the clowns running the country!


Sure, the Government would never take advantage and campaign for Chavez

July 29, 2006

Of course the Government will not take advantage of its position and campaign for the President. The Electoral Board will simply not allow it, we are protected by law and the Constitution. Chavez can stay in the Presidency as a candidate, it is a matter of continuity and he is a good guy, he would never abuse his position or take advantage of it.

If by any chance the Government tried to sell toothpaste packaged like the one below in the Government’s Mercal chain of markets it would be immediately stopped.

What do you say? They are selling it already? Just like that? And it has the symbol of the ten million votes for Chavez campaign? And it says ten million smiles? And all Mercal’s are carrying it?

Oh well, I guess I was wrong.