Good and provocative reading in today’s papers, I thought of translating some of it, but there is so much, that I can just point out to those that speak Spanish where the good or interesting stuff is:
—Historian Manuel Caballero talks about how behind the call for “popular power” Chavez is simply concentrating more power and how Chavez misunderstands the Russian revolution, where the workers were not asking to own the factories, they already owned them, but they wanted peace. Some quotes:
“In my book “Why I am not Bolivarian” I write and analise Umberto Eco’s thesis about fascism, because there has never been a whole group of people with a single way of thinking “I interpret it because I am the people”. And Eco says that in that case “the people” become a theatrical fiction that is only good for applauding. The people that go to Chavez’ rallies are not there to listen to him, only to watch him. Is the same as Sabado Sensacional” (A marathonic TV program all Saturday’s that has been on for decades)…the people that voted for Chavez in 98 and a large fraction of those that have continued voting for him do not do it to go against corruption, out of anger or frustration or because they wanted a good Government, but because they wanted a dictatorship. “
—Psychoanalyst Adrain Lieberman talks about Venezuelans, their envy, their values and violence in Venezuela. An excerpt:
“More than democrats in Venezuela, what we have is a libertarian spirit, we do not trust regulating institutions, we want to do whatever we want. We have a democratic vocation only in its formal aspects”
—Telecom analyst Victor Suarez asks what controls will the anti-monopoly regulator impose on the Government once it owns CANTV and questions the Government’s argument for nationalizing CANTV:
“In front of the verbal and administrative firing squad should be the Government officials that promised that the people would have more access to communications. Those that offered and did not fulfill their promises that the citizens would have more access to communications. Those that offered and did not fulfill their promises in eight years of Government”
—Pro-Chavez historian Margrita Lopez Maya expresses her concerns about what has been happening in the last two weeks, in particular, how Chavez seems uninterested in anybody’s opinion but his:
“Based on some of the things proposed, a process has begun of slowly weakening liberal democracy. I think we are going towards an institutional weakening of the National Assembly as a space for deliberation and the depositor of popular sovereignty. Equality and autonomy of powers rule the 99 Constitution, but I think there is the intention of inducing a modification to go towards the subordination of all powers to the Presidency”
—Alberto Barrera writes on Chavez’ vision of society (can’t find it online):
“Hugo Chavez never had that very Venezuelan need to go out in the streets and get a quick job. The State, bourgeois and liberal, always gave him everything…I suspect that XXIst. Century Socialism has a great problem: Its main manager is the “new man” from the IVth. Republic”