November 1, 2007

It is
anybody’s guess why the Autocrat/President/Chief Justice of the Supreme Court “came to the conclusion” that indeed the proposed
Constitutional Reform could be voted separately in two or three blocks and not
as a unit like he and his cohorts had contended up to now. It was he, in his
role as autocrat, that arrived at the decision and not the Supreme Court, which
has had a number of injunctions on the subject for the last two months, but
clearly did not want to go against the wishes of the all powerful autocrat. And
as proof that he is the law, he ordered the National Assembly to incorporate
his suggestions in order to vote on the reform as soon as possible.

But it was
not clear why he did it, since the proposal forces the Electoral Board to throw
away all of what it had done in order to fulfill the Constitutional mandate
that this has to be voted on 30 days after the National Assembly approves it.

therein lies the first problem; the changes would make it quite difficult for
the referendum vote to take place on December 2nd. as planned, which has led
some to suggest that that was exactly the purpose. But I just don’t buy it.
Time is running against the Government and the proposal is not very popular and
on top of that regional authorities, who would get the Chavista vote out for
the reform, seem to have little interest in doing so, as they will see their
power reduced by the reform.

In fact,
the proposal raised more questions that answers, as some of the articles
proposed by The Assembly are related the ones proposed by Chávez and you could
not separate them. Just sorting that out, as well as the advertising on the
different proposals could take days and there is simple no time for that.

In fact,
the about face suggests that it would have been better off for the Supreme
Court to rule as it would have delineated the criteria on how to vote these
reforms and how one can propose or not that some articles are voted as a block.

Some have
suggested this may make the proposed reform more popular as it would seem more
open, but I just think that the whole affair just gets more confusing and it
may just be that Chavez came up with this on his own and announced without consultation
without realizing the possible consequences of the measure.

But to
suggest this, just when the cry of the students has been for a postponement of
the referendum seems to give ammunition to the student’s proposal, which I do
not believe will favor Chavismo. To begin with, shortages are increasing and
people are getting frustrated with them and they are blaming only the Chavez
Government. Add to that the upcoming rush in inflation due to the new tax and
the soaring swap rate and the mood, which has already been rarified by protests
lately, can only become worse. Additionally, the Enabling Bill also imposes a
time limit on the approval of the Constitution since there are many bills that
require approval.

I also
don’t buy that Chavez could lose the proposal as it stands today. It is clear
that what people don’t like is the indefinite reelection, but Chavez is putting
that on the same block with the shortened work week and the retroactive
severance pay, so there is little chance that it has something to with it.

But the
gauntlet has been thrown and now Chavismo will have to disentangle its
consequences, unless of course, the Venezuelan Supreme Court rules that Chávez
is wrong and the whole thing was a ploy to make him look more open that he
really is. Just in case this is the goal, Teodoro Petkoff challenged Chavez to
separate the indefinite reelection from his overall proposal to be voted on
separately, which Chavez will never dare accept. But even this theory of the
“more open” and “gentler” Chavez seems too far-fetched and inconsequential to
be behind the proposal.

So, we
will just have to wait and see how the complexity is disentangled from the
autocrat’s proposal and if the CNE has the capability to hold the vote in 31
days as the National Assembly wants. It definitely seems rushed to me, but so
has seemed the whole process that has led us to this point and to an absolutely
fraudulent and illegal proposal by Chavez to change the Venezuelan Constitution.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: