Archive for April, 2003

Rosendo’s Testimony: The massacre of April 11th.

April 15, 2003

 


I view this blog as part documentary on this bizarre time my country is going through, hoping that when it ends, it will add some value to the analysis of what has happened. While the Chavez administration and his supporters have managed to turn around the criminal acts of April 11th. 2002 into some sort of devious coup by the opposition, the truth is that people have forgotten the massacre that took place that day and who was responsible for the deaths. Yes, Pedro Carmona violated the law and tried to disband Congress, but I see little difference between that and what Chavez does almost daily. But if there was someone close to Chavez in the days leading to April 11th. 2002 it was General Manuel Rosendo, the Head of Cufan who was in charge of internal security. In Sunday’s El Universal Rosendo tells his story and some parts of it should be paid closed attention to. Rosendo was loyal to Chávez until the very end, from being hated by the opposition he became a folk hero for standing up to Chavez in the most damning testimony in the National Assembly against the President. Here are the highlights of his Sunday interview on the events of last April, which shed some light on Chavez’ role in the massacre:


 


-On April 7th. the President told him to stay to meet with some Deputies and Governors. A Deputy (Ismael Garcia) proposed what Rosendo considered to be a macabre plan: To use the Bolivarian circles against the upcoming march by the opposition. They talked about firing all oil workers (it happened months later), about a state of exception and of buying out oil workers by giving them a bonus not to strike. His worst charge: the Attorney General was present at the meeting.


 


-On April 10th. Rosendo met with the Head of the National Guard to “fraudulently” take over oil installations at the starting point of the planned march so that the square would be taken over in the morning. He met with the President that day And Chavez aborted the PDVSA plan. Rosendo says Chavez told him: “My uniform and my rifle are ready to shoot at anyone that tries to thwart this revolution that has cost me so much”


 


On April 11th in the morning when he hears that the march is going towards the Presidential palace Rosendo suggested they remove the Bolivarian circles and allow the march to go by the palace. The Minister of Defense Rangel (today the Vice-President) tells Rosendo that he is no “asshole” and that “I will die preserving this revolution’. Later Rosendo’s subordinate calls him and tells him that Rangel and the Mayor of Libertador District spoke on the phone about having the circles come face the peaceful march and that the opposition is shitting in their pants” (Note: Rangel denied this conversation ever took place but the Mayor was actually caught on TV live taking the call from Rangel).


 


Opposition leader Ortega (now in exile) calls Rosendo and tells him 17 people are dead. Rangel tells him there is only one death and it is “ours” Rosendo gets mad and tells him he is quitting, but Rangel says the President wants to talk to him. Rosendo says:” Do you think I am dumb, the President is on nationwide TV addressing the nation. (This led everyone to believe Chavez’ address had been prerecorded)


 


In front of Chavez Rangel denies giving the order to have the Bolivarian Circles face the march. Chavez ratifies this but another General says he heard it too.


 


Chavez accepts that he has to leave his position and he says he wants to go to Cuba. Rosendo says Chavez told him” I don’t want to wake up in Venezuela. I want to go to Cuba. Make all the arrangements.” Chavez refused to sign his resignation when some Generals said he had to stay and face a trial


 


Rosendo closes by saying: Where did Lucas Rincon get his information that the President resigned? (Lucas Rincon went on TV saying that) I was with Chávez all the time and nobody asked him to. There has to be a well kept secret that Lucas has to explain to the country


 


My take: Yes, Carmona staged a Constitutional coup afterwards, but Chavez and his partisans certainly planned the tragic end to the peaceful march by the opposition. Chavez did resign; he just never put it in writing

World Encounters of the worst kind

April 14, 2003

 


            If it were not so bizarre it may even have been funny to see the extreme left of the anti-globalization crowd in Caracas, celebrating the first year anniversary of the failed coup against Chavez in an event called “World encounter of solidarity with the Bolivarian revolution” . No mention was made of the deaths or the fact that after one year not a single one of those suspected of shooting against the peaceful opposition crowd has been jailed. In fact, only two weeks earlier the shooters of Puente El Llaguno, who everybody saw shooting on tape, were freed supposedly for lack of evidence. But here they were in Caracas, hailing Hugo Chavez and his return to power on the shoulders of the “people” without anyone mentioning that he was brought back by some of the same Generals that sent him away after seeing Pedro Carmona act the way he did that day.


 


            And Venezuelan could not help but worry at the crowd. They had all come to pay their respects to Chavez, from the European left of Ignacio Ramonet of Le Monde Diplomatique to the leader of Bolivian coca growers Evo Romero, who certainly did not endear himself to most Venezuelans by expressing his happiness at seeing Venezuela becoming a second Cuba. And they cheered Hugo Chavez as he told the crowd that his revolution was armed and ready to defend itself, as much as they cheered Cuba’s Vice-President on the same day that three Cubans faced death by firing squad for their part on the bloodless hijacking of a ferry less than two weeks ago. Or their cheers for Daniel Ortega who now sides with those that commit the same horrors that Somoza used to commit in Nicaragua and allowed him and his Sandinistas, however briefly, to reach power there.


 


            But it was real and it was all here. Hundreds of guests invited and paid by a State from funds of unknown origin to hail the man that wants to become their leader thanks to the oil money that he so efficiently uses for everything but the good of his people. And they simply cheered his failed revolution and the failed models of the sixties. And we were all shaken up by the threat of an armed revolution and the fact that democracy and human rights were simply not mentioned. Bizarre? Yes, but very real.

Some more pictures

April 13, 2003


Nice Cattleya Intermedia                                          A better Laelia Lobata picture



A closer picture of the Tolumnia I posted yesterday. Note that it is less than a centimeter in size. You could probably fit close to three in one inch.

Oil, Iraq and The Devil’s Excrement

April 13, 2003

Tony sent this link to an article in today’s Boston Globe talking about the fact that oil is indeed The Devil’s Excrement and how oil is more of a curse than a blessing.

The naviete of Rep. Charles Rangel

April 13, 2003

Rep. Charles Rangel, a Democrat from New York, is quoted in the New York Times as saying:


“This about ends that discussion, I don’t know how far they are going to go, but they know how to support their enemies and get rid of their friends.”


Enemies? Friends? How naive can this guy be? Fidel Castro has never had any friends. The few he had, he killed or expelled from Cuba. Killing people like this is not new to castro. Does Rangel know how many people Castro killed his first day in Havana? And they were exactly the politicians that would make life hard for him. Does Rangel really think that Dictators change? Or that Castro will somehow be converted into respecting people’s human rights when he has not given a damn for 44 years. Moreover, these people are not Castro’s enemies for no reason, they oppose Castro, precisely because of what Castro has done in the last four decades. Somebody should tell Mr. Rangel about the Los Pinos jail, to see if he still feels like being a friend of Castro afterwards. Wake up Mr Rangel!


Note added: I tremble when I read this article in which Fidel Castro expresses his happiness at being a witness to what is happening in Venezuela today. Mr. Rangel should worry too.

Huge Explosion, police blames the opposition

April 12, 2003

Huge explosion this moring at 2:45 AM in the Teleport building where the OAS-mediated negotiations are taking place. Hours after the explosion the investigative police blames coup plotters for the explosion because the “modus operandi” is the same as the bombs in the Spanish and Colombian Embassies. Now, as far as anybody knows, nobody has been charged or accused of causing those explosions, so the quickness of the investigative police is truly amazing and has absolutely no basis. Alejandro Armas of the opposition negotiating team rejects the accusation . So does Alejandro Martin who says that only those that don’t want an agreement would benefit from the explosion. Some are calling for the removal of the Head of the investigative police. What is true is that whenever Chavez criticizes something a bomb appears…..Who benefits from any delays? Only Chavez and his Government. You be the judge.

Chavez blasts negotaition table, the same day it reaches agreement

April 12, 2003

On the same day the negotiation table reached an agreement which apparently puts limits to the dates for the recall referendum as well as saying it will have international supervision, Hugo Chavez actually questioned the effectiveness of the negotiation process, saying that the opposition was represented by coup plotters. So is the agreement worth anything? Nobody really knows. Note that the Vice-President is part of the negotiation process.

Two Headlines: Castro kills three, Bolivian praises Venezuelan following Cuba

April 12, 2003

Two headlines in Venezuela’s daily El Nacional:


Castro’s firing squad kills three hijackers of ferry (Front page and page B-10)


The three were found guilty of hijacking the ferry, there were no injured or harmed or killed, eight others were found guilty and face prison terms from two years to life. Interesting how quiet the US media is about this (except Miami papers, of course). There were only nine days between the hijacking and the sentencing, demonstrating its political nature. Where are all the Human Rights organization’s today?


Evo Morales: Venezuela is in the process of becomeing a second Cuba (Front page and page A-5)


Now, don’t get Mr. Morales wrong, he is actually very happy about this. As Head of Bolivias’ coca growers, he is delighted that we are going towards the Cuban model. According to him, this is wonderful, even if poor people are doing worse. In fact, in his rampant ignorance he says that in Bolivia GDP is growing, but he can’t see how people are doing better. Well, here GDP is shrinking but we can actually see how people are doing worse, but that is irrelevant to him. As a matter of fact, critical poverty under Chavez has become worse than Iraq’s! But you know, I must be a technocrat that only thinks of stupid numbers.  Let’s grow more coca! Mr. Morales was invited to “celebrate” the anniversary of the Miraflores Massacre, which to him was “the people defending the Chavez Government” somehow.


So, after reading the front page, should I be estatic that my country is becoming a second Cuba? What does Mr. Morales have in his brain? Coca? Derivatives of Coca? If we are becoming Cuba, it is clear who has the weapons: The Government, not the opposition……


 

New camera, new pictures

April 12, 2003


Tolumnia species, can’t find which one          Phal. Balban’s Kaleidoscope



Laelia Lobata                                                     Ctna. Why Not


Playing with my new camera, still trying to figure out how best to take close up macro pictures. Lot’s of fun!

Is linking illegal?

April 12, 2003

 


received the following e-mail a couple of days ago:


 


 You are using our image with out permission on your website.  We have a
 $2,000.00 copyright infringement fee that is automatic when you violate
 our copyrights!  Please give me your mailing address so I can send you
 the bill.  Once you pay the bill you can continue to use our photo on
 your website for the rest of this year, but as it stands, its been up
 for quite a while now.  Please send me your updated mailing address or
 we can find that with our lawyers.  If we need to hire our lawyers to
 collect this fee its going to be much more then the $2,000.00 (in order
 to pay the lawyers).   Your choice.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Jimmy Dorantes
 Director and CEO of Latin Focus ((c)L.F.)


 


I obviously did not like it. In particular the tone was not only not very nice, but it also sounded almost like a scam, maybe you send thousands like this and some people will actually send the money in. A second reason was the fact that it did not even mention the image that I had used. Third, what is this “automatic copyright infringement fee”?.


 


So I replied and an answer came back pointing to an approximate location where this image was. It turns out I was not “using” the image; I was linking to their image on their website. The image itself indicated that they had a copyright on it. Thus, I was being threatened for linking. After a little research I have discovered a number of things:


 


Linking is considered to be legal as no case has said that direct linking to the source is illegal. This reference is perhaps the most complete I found to the issue and within my limited understanding it appears to conclude that  it is legal  “because the linking party is not doing anything that seems to involve a direct manipulation of the copyrighted materials at all” . In fact, the ACLU has aided in cases against linking because it considers it to be part of free speech. So, I could probably get free legal counsel.


 


-In one case linking was declared illegal if you linked to what was considered an illegal copy of the software to decode DVD’s. Similarly, some organizations have asked people to remove hyperlinks to illegal sites or illegally copied material, such as the case of a terrorist site and the University of California in San Diego.


 


-There is one case in Denmark where a Court ruled the practice of “Deep linking” illegal. The decision basically said you could link to the main page of a site but not specific items. I remembered that I still have a bank account in Denmark, from the time I was a visiting Prof. there in the eighties. Last I saw it had five bucks in it, so I guess they could sue me there.


 


-It is also interesting to consider the fact that my website is not for profit. I do not even have a Pay Pal link. Maybe I could declare The Devil’s Excrement under Chapter 11. In fact, if you say my time does not count, I am down forty bucks with this site so far. Well spent, but I certainly have not profited in any way from the linking to the image. Even if I had, I wonder if I could argue that I would only have to pay them the fraction of clicks on the link to their site divided by all the clicks ever made to my site. Given that it is not the most visited part of my website, it would be a miniscule amount anyway, even if mine was a well-visited, for profit site.


 


-I also found opinions on the web that if someone does not want his/her site linked it, it should say it on the home page explicitly and prominently. However, others disagree on this and this site has the policies of some companies. In any case, the only warning in the Latin Focus page (home page under warnings, no deep linking involved) is, as of today:


 


No images may used for other websites or published in any way, medium or media without written permission and appropriate fees paid to Latin Focus for each use


 


Notice it says you can’t use it in your website, but it does not say you should not link to their site.


 


-Prof. David Dorkin has a web site about the topic and I love this quote from him: “Linking policies demonstrate ignorance”


 


-There are other interesting possibilities. Venezuela has exchange controls, not a single dollar has been given out for essential imports in the last 80 days by the Government. Even if I lost the suit, how could I pay them? How much will the money at the official rate be worth by the end of the process? Will they sue here? Do they know the justice system does not work here? Ummm…..maybe I could get Daintily Dirty to send them a pair of panties and that will settle it……