Without fingerprint machines, it is time to go and defend your vote, I will

November 29, 2005

Before the
developments of the last few days I was going to vote. For a very simple
reason: you gain very little by not voting unless everyone in the opposition
decides not to vote. What is clear is that if the CNE had not decided to back
down on the use of the fingerprint grabbing machines, everyone would have
called for voters to abstain, because in contrast with the observation missions
that came for the recall referendum, the two currently in Caracas, the one from
the OAS and the one from the EU have been saying in private what the OAS and
the Carter Center never said in the recall vote. And they are applying pressure
and it is showing, by now the CNE is absolutely embarrassed by their cynical
two-faced behavior and they know these observers can’t be fooled and they are
here to stay.

The negative side

problems remain. Besides the “morochas” or twins, which will allow the Chavez
coalition to get a larger percentage of Deputies in the Assembly that their
votes should give them, there is the electoral registry, with its fake data,
duplicity and migrations that nobody can fix.

Then there
are little details like the President of the Electoral Board Jorge Rodriguez
suddenly appearing to become objective in the presence of the observers, threatening
to fine all those Government officials appearing on campaign literature or advertising,
forgetting that he had allowed the ultimate unfair advantage: the presence of
Chavez’ face on all of the ballots representing Chavez’ MVR, its twin party UVE
and others supporting it. There it is, on the ballot itself, the ultimate unfair
advantage that Rodriguez claims is absent from the process, approved, sealed
and ratified by the CNE, under protest form the opposition parties. And the
international observers have taken notice

Electronic voting in the past

This will
be the fourth process in a row in which electronic voting with the Smartmatic
machines and the Cogent fingerprint machines is used. In each case, there are
four basic components to the system: The Smartmatic voting machine, the
tallying system, the transmission and the fingerprint machines.

The Smartmatic machine is a windows based
machine with all of the file systems of windows, the same processes, controls
etc. It has USB ports, can transmit and can print. The Cogent AFIS system is
really a software system that looks at certain characteristic features of
fingerprints and matches it with a database, it comes with hardware like the
fingerprint reader and a laptop made by somebody else, mostly IBM. The tallying system is just a piece of
software that adds the votes according to the characteristics of the electoral
process going on, i.e., it is not the same for a recall vote than for a more
complex election for city councilmen or Deputies.

Recall Referendum:
Despite claims to the contrary,
for the recall referendum the software was never tested or audited. Despite
promises that there would be no transmissions between the voting machines and
the servers during the day, there were not only transmissions all day, but in
some cases more material was transmitted in one direction than the other. There
were supposed to be 120 “hot audits” the night of the recall, only 30 of them
took place. (Curiously the vote against Chávez won in these, although
statistically it is not meaningful). There was a “cold” audit a few days later
under circumstances that leave a lot to be desired. The fingerprint machines
did not work well everywhere. In some locations they were not used, in others
they were used by choice of the voter.

Governor and Regional elections: The only improvement made was that
the machines were connected to the network only at the end of the day. However,
the totals were printed only after the transmission took place. The
fingerprint machines worked rather well. In fact, the suspicion is that the
Government used them as a real time exit poll, which combined with the data
from the recall referendum petition allowed them to know where they were doing
well, where they needed to go and get the voters out and where to concentrate

The Current elections: A group of technical people was
allowed this time to look at the machines and their software. They first looked
at the machines. Each vote becomes a file in the Windows system, with three
dates and times which correspond to its creation, modification and last save.
All three of these are erased and using a randomizer certified by Microsoft,
each vote is saved in a different location of the memory. In this manner all
traces of the sequence of the votes was supposed to be lost.

the technicians noticed that if you used the type of file system tools, free in
the Internet, that are used for file examination and recovery on an NTFS disk
drive, you could locate a file that had a fourth date and time stamp associated
with each file and thus the sequence of voters could be known. If you then correlated this with the orders in
which people used the fingerprint capturing system, then each vote could be
exactly matched to each person.

Of course,
the CNE and Smartmatic technicians and officers had always denied the
possibility that this could be done. Last Wednesday in a mock up vote in
Caracas, in the presence of the international observers, ten people voted and
the technicians afterwards told each person which votes was his or hers, And as
they say “the you know what hit the fan” and the rest is now history. (Even
afterwards the President of the CNE denied this possibility with virulence).

But for
once, political parties were united, either the fingerprint machines were
eliminated or they would all withdraw. That is what is called a good way to
abstain, all or nothing. The President of the CNE offered then to disconnect
the fingerprint syetm, but under pressure from the observers and the fear that
the world would know the truth about Venezuelan elections (recall three elections,
including the recall vote were done with this very faulty system) forced the
CNE to yield the use of the fingerprint capturing machines on Sunday. (Some
parties are still doubtful of participating now).

technicians also checked and tested all other aspects of the software without
finding any possibility of changing, altering or manipulating the results. This
system is now activated by the use of three keys or passwords, one of which is
in the hands only of the opposition. Thus, an opposition member has to be
present to activate it.

Tallying and transmitting the
technicians also looked at the process of printing, tallying and transmitting
the votes. In the previous processes, the tallying was performed and to the surprise
of the technicians, the machines not only send the totals, but also send the contents
of each one of the votes. This may seem weird at first, in Venezuelan elections
many parties may support a candidate and there are circuits, like the one where
I live, where there are two candidates to vote for. Now, according to
Venezuelan law, a party may change the candidate it supports up to five days
before an election, by that time all voting machines are out in the field, thus
the program can no longer be changed. Thus, all votes have to be transmitted so
that if this happens events like a person voting twice for the same candidate do
not take place.

Once the votes
are tallied, the machine is made to print the totals for each candidate in a
record that has a number (000) that certifies it as being pre-transmission. Once this is printed the machine is connected
to the network
and the transmission
is allowed to begin and after that everyone present can get a copy of the
tally, which will now have a different number (001).

At this
point, the witnesses do a tally of the paper ballots in 45% of all voting
centers, another new
feature that was
not available in previous electoral processes. The law says 100% of the
paper ballots should be counted, but this will not be done. The rule of
law is not the CNE’s strength.

Can there be cheating
it is possible to be at a polling station with no opposition witness, transmit
first and then manipulate the results before the tally is printed. This would obviously
be the opposition’s fault. But there are 27,000 machines out there.

But the
point is that the process has been cleaned, checked and certified sufficiently
that with the withdrawal of the fingerprint machines the process should be more
transparent, fairer and cleaner than it was a week ago.

absence of the fingerprint machine has many advantages besides eliminating the
possibility of reconstructing the sequence: it removes the fear people have of the
Government knowing how they vote and losing their jobs, contracts or otherwise
being the victims of another Tascon-like list. Besides this, the Government
will no longer have the real time exit poll that will allow it to mobilize
voters where needed, paying them and driving them to vote. Either they mobilize
everyone or else.

Of course,
there are thousands of fake ID cards and corresponding voters out there and
many other tricks in the Electoral Registry. But, we should not become like the
Chavistas that we want to win everything and hold all positions. To claim that
we have been cheated we have to vote. The Chavistas appear to be a majority at
this time, but they are not a happy majority, they do not like the way problems
in Venezuela are not solved while Chavez seems to be trying to solve everyone
else’s problem, while neglecting ours. Both sides are not motivated, so that if
the opposition can have less abstention, the Chavismo may be blocked from grabbing
TOTAL control of the National Assembly. This should be our goal at this time and
with the removal of the fingerprint machines it is doable. If in
August’s regional elections abstention was 80%, you can bet it will be much
larger with fewer local leaders to motivate the voters. Additionally, the whole
campaign has been lackluster for both sides.

Thus, next
Sunday I will be there. I do not believe in any plan to have an alternative
other than to have held a separate election and count how many we are. Nobody
can count how many people go or not to church. If you want to call for
abstention do it, while mix religion and politics? Some people do not even like
to go to church or may not be seeing doing so.

It is simply
too late, in my opinion, to start to improvise. It is time to vote, or not to
vote, there is still a little freedom in this country for this and for now, you have a choice. I have made mine.
I will vote and in the evening I will go help count and will make sure my copy of
the tally sheet has a 001 at the bottom. Hopefully, most of you will do the
same, no matter what your political ideas are. It’s called democracy and as
long as it has a chance, we should also give it a chance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: