Archive for the 'Venezuela' Category

B.R. 101: Injustice for the dead

August 24, 2002

B.R. 101: Injustice for the dead.


In April a peaceful demonstration asking the President to resign was massacred by Government supporters. Eighteen people were killed, more than one hundred injured. The President resigned, was replaced and came back in less than two days. One of his promises upon his return was to establish a “Truth Commision” to learn the truth about the killings. Today, four months later, the National Assembly controlled by the Government has yet to vote on establishing this commision.


Ten days ago, the Venezuelan Supreme Court ruled that the Generals that refused to obey the President’s orders that day in April could not be tried for rebellion. Six days ago, the National Assembly speedily formed a Commission to investigate if any of the Supreme Court Justices lied about their credentials when they were named to the Highest Court. (A fact that was noted by the opposition when they were named to the Court).


Four months for the dead, four days for the President. That is called the exercise of immoral power.

B.R. 101: Another Economic Mystery brought to you by……

August 23, 2002

B.R. 101: Another Economic Mystery brought to you by……


The <A href=”>Venezuelan economy shrank by 9.9% in the second quarter, after shrinking 4.1% in the first quarter to give a combined record of 7.1% the largest such contraction for one quarter in the country’s history. Isn’t this the definition of a depression? Or is that just the way I feel? Way to go Hugo Chavez!!


The Government blames the strike in April for this, but the economy had shrunk 4.1% in the first quarter before there was a strike. Remarkably, oil prices have been at extremely high levels all year long and are today at almost the highest historical levels. What can you expect from a Government that misplaces US$ 2.3 billion (or is it more?).

August 21, 2002

Police State or Democracy?


Imagine this:


The Mayor of City X notices a car following him for a few days. He sets up a raid with his own city police and they surround the car and arrest the people inside the car, noticing that there is some taping equipment within the car. The guys inside the car identify themselves as intelligence police. The Mayor calls the Attorney General to send someone to witness what is happening. While they wait, heavily armed members of the intelligence police show up to try to “liberate” the other agents. The Mayor insists they wait until the representative from the Attorney General’s office shows up. They refuse. Weapons are drawn. The Mayor and some cops stand on the way of the car so that it is not taken away. They back up the car over the sidewalk, running over three cops including the Director of the City Police. All of the agents of the intelligence police go away as cops, TV cameraman and others try to follow them. The Mayor accuses the people in the car of taping his conversations as he represents an opposition party.


 


Hitler 1940? Argentina 1976? Pinochet 1985? Fidel the last 40 years? No, Venezuela August 21 2002. This is the “democratic” Government the world asked be returned to power in April after the President resigned after his police massacred a peaceful demonstration.

August 21, 2002

Police State or Democracy?


Imagine this:


The Mayor of City X notices a car following him for a few days. He sets up a raid with his own city police and they surround the car and arrest the people inside the car, noticing that there is some taping equipment within the car. The guys inside the car identify themselves as intelligence police. The Mayor calls the Attorney General to send someone to witness what is happening. While they wait, heavily armed members of the intelligence police show up to try to “liberate” the other agents. The Mayor insists they wait until the representative from the Attorney General’s office shows up. They refuse. Weapons are drawn. The Mayor and some cops stand on the way of the car so that it is not taken away. They back up the car over the sidewalk, running over three cops including the Director of the City Police. All of the agents of the intelligence police go away as cops, TV cameraman and others try to follow them. The Mayor accuses the people in the car of taping his conversations as he represents an opposition party.


 


Hitler 1940? Argentina 1976? Pinochet 1985? Fidel the last 40 years? No, Venezuela August 21 2002. This is the “democratic” Government the world asked be returned to power in April after the President resigned after his police massacred a peaceful demonstration.

August 21, 2002

Police State or Democracy?


Imagine this:


The Mayor of City X notices a car following him for a few days. He sets up a raid with his own city police and they surround the car and arrest the people inside the car, noticing that there is some taping equipment within the car. The guys inside the car identify themselves as intelligence police. The Mayor calls the Attorney General to send someone to witness what is happening. While they wait, heavily armed members of the intelligence police show up to try to “liberate” the other agents. The Mayor insists they wait until the representative from the Attorney General’s office shows up. They refuse. Weapons are drawn. The Mayor and some cops stand on the way of the car so that it is not taken away. They back up the car over the sidewalk, running over three cops including the Director of the City Police. All of the agents of the intelligence police go away as cops, TV cameraman and others try to follow them. The Mayor accuses the people in the car of taping his conversations as he represents an opposition party.


 


Hitler 1940? Argentina 1976? Pinochet 1985? Fidel the last 40 years? No, Venezuela August 21 2002. This is the “democratic” Government the world asked be returned to power in April after the President resigned after his police massacred a peaceful demonstration.

August 21, 2002

Police State or Democracy?


Imagine this:


The Mayor of City X notices a car following him for a few days. He sets up a raid with his own city police and they surround the car and arrest the people inside the car, noticing that there is some taping equipment within the car. The guys inside the car identify themselves as intelligence police. The Mayor calls the Attorney General to send someone to witness what is happening. While they wait, heavily armed members of the intelligence police show up to try to “liberate” the other agents. The Mayor insists they wait until the representative from the Attorney General’s office shows up. They refuse. Weapons are drawn. The Mayor and some cops stand on the way of the car so that it is not taken away. They back up the car over the sidewalk, running over three cops including the Director of the City Police. All of the agents of the intelligence police go away as cops, TV cameraman and others try to follow them. The Mayor accuses the people in the car of taping his conversations as he represents an opposition party.


 


Hitler 1940? Argentina 1976? Pinochet 1985? Fidel the last 40 years? No, Venezuela August 21 2002. This is the “democratic” Government the world asked be returned to power in April after the President resigned after his police massacred a peaceful demonstration.

Supreme Curt decides

August 14, 2002

Not so much banana-like, Supreme Court finally decides…..


 


When I began writing this blog, my main objective was to try to convey, particularly to those that live in more developed countries, a sense of what countries like mine are like and what makes us the way we are. I actually began with thoughts on a decision by the Venezuelan Supreme Court not to prosecute four of the Generals that refused to obey orders from President Hugo Chavez to use the military to contain demonstrators in April. This refusal led to the President’s resignation. A new temporary President took charge and decided to dissolve the National Assembly, Supreme Court and other powers, which led to an outcry both in Venezuela and abroad which resulted in the return of Hugo Chavez as President.


 


Well, the day of my first blog the Court refused to approve the proposal to prosecute the Generals for rebellion. As I said then, I found it depressing that we all knew the decision and the vote even before it took place. What was even worse was that the President of the Court chose a Judge from the minority to write the new opinion. This bizarre decision was simply a way of delaying the decision while the Government pressured the Judges to change their minds. And pressure they did, but not enough as the new decision was also rejected, even if one vote changed sides in favor of the Government. At that time, there was no recourse but to choose a judge from the majority. The President pressured the Court repeatedly, mixing the refusal of the Generals to use force against the people with the fact that the temporary President violated the Constitution. Chavez went as far as saying that if “the referee did not act properly he would get rid of the referee”. But he pressure did not help and today the Court decided by an 11-8 vote that the Generals were not guilty of rebellion (for which you need the use of force).


 


As the article by Friedman in the NYT today points out, freedom and democracy, however weak, are necessary prerequisites for development. While in India, where democracy is ingrained, the richest man is a software entrepreneur, in Pakistan next door, it is one of the tribal Chiefs that rule the country. Venezuela’s institutions are weak. Two years ago, these judges would have never dared go against the President, he was all powerful and going against him meant losing their jobs. (It is not a lifetime job in Venezuela). But with time, his power, his popularity and his majority in the National assembly have all eroded. This means he has to play a democratic game, which so far he is not ready to do. In his heyday he had 80% popularity, which was bad. Unfortunately for him, he now has barely 20%, bad for him, but I would like to believe good for our democratic system. Our institutions maybe weak, but in time decisions like today should help us strengthen them.

A not so Supreme Court

August 4, 2002

A not so Supreme Court


The big event this week in Venezuela was the fact that the Supreme Court did not approve a decision that would have started a trial for rebellion against four Generals which help to oust the Venezuelan President for two days in April. Analysts have focused on the decision (8 for, 12 abstained), the fact that the new decision will now be written by someone in the minority and whether the Court is simply delaying a decision. To me however, the most bothersome aspect has been that the Highest Court in the land also seems to be the most unethical. Newspapers had known the details of the decision for weeks. As early as three weeks ago, it was known that the vote would be 11-9 or 12-8, for the last two weeks it has been known with precision not only that it would be 12-8, but who was on each side. Thus the Supreme Court is composed of 20 men and women, who openly talk not only about the way they will vote, but the contents of the decisions being voted on even before they do. The question is not only is this a solid foundation to build a country on, but should we really care how they decide?