One of our
readers, amieres, has been analyzing the Electoral Registry (REP) and found
numerous interesting things that should be made public in detail. I invited him
to write a post on it and he was gracious enough to accept my invitation and
here is the post with all the details. This goes right to the heart of the
question why the CNE does not want a good audit of the REP made, it would show
all of these inconsistencies. Only today El Nacional showed how there are more
people above the age of 45 registered to vote that the National Institute for
Statistics (INE) says there exist in that age group. This incredible
inconsistency is why the three universities rejected by the CNE to perform the
audit wanted a wider audit that would include demographics. Now wonder the CNE
does not want this!
Mision Matusalen by amieres (Mission Methuselah by amieres)
First some background
In March
2004 when the Presidential Recall Referendum (RR) process was in its way the
Electoral Registry (RE) had 12,394,109 voters. In a multi-tiered campaign that
Chavez called “Batalla de Santa Ines” a big push was made to add new
voters to the RE. That’s how the Misiones were created: Mision Robinson, Mision
Ribas, Mision Vuelvan Caras, Mision Barrio
Adentro, Mercal, Mision Milagro, Mision Identidad, Mision Zamora, etc. http://www.gobiernoenlinea.ve/miscelaneas/misiones.html.
A variety of public assistance efforts offering anything from food, health
care, education, land, temporary jobs and of course money.
Particularly
Mision Identidad offered foreigners living in Venezuela a fast-track
nationalization, no questions asked, as long as they showed support for Chavez.
Everyone that benefited from the ‘misiones’ was registered in the Maisanta
database and if they were not already part of the RE they were immediately
entered in a joint effort between the CNE and the ONI-DEX (the National Identification
Office). By July 2004 the RE had grown to 14,037,900 an incredible 1,643,791
new voters or 13% in just 4 months.
In August
15th, 2004 Chavez won a widely denounced Referendum with 60%-40% advantage that
in the exit polls showed as 40%-60% against him.
The Lists
The
Maisanta list, a by-product of the RR, was created by the chavistas by merging
the infamous Tascon list with the RE of March 2004 and complementing it with
the information from the Misiones and the Reparos. It is a tool that serves the
double purpose of identifying, pressuring and discriminating against those that
opposed Chavez but also to identify, keep track and pressure those that have
benefited from the Misiones. Last year, Maisanta was leaked into the public and
it was being sold by street vendors for Bs 15000 (about 8 dollars). It quickly
found its way into the internet where it can be downloaded.
Following
the lead of Adolfo Fabregat I also downloaded the official RE of January 2006
from the CNE website (http://www.cne.gov.ve/int_generacion_re/html/index.html)
and combined it with the Maisanta list. That allowed me to compare the changes in
the RE between March 2004 and January 2006. By January 2006 the REP had grown
to 14,849,127 adding 811,227 more since August 2004.
The first
thing to note, is that the RE is full of irregularities, practically everywhere
you look you can find something wrong with it.
Several of
the discrepancies have already been denounced:
– The
amazing Gonzalez family.
– The one
letter names and last names.
– The
duplicate entries.
– The
extraordinaire longevity of Venezuelans
Partly, I
wanted to verify these findings myself, which I did and so and now I can attest
to their veracity and give you specific instances of those cases.
The Analysis
Based on
the information reported in the TV and newspapers my general belief was that
most new entries to the RE would be from foreigners hastily nationalized, youth
that recently have reached the voting age of 18th and to a much lesser degree
of people that had never voted previously but benefited from the ‘Misiones’.
Thus my expectation was to find only a few new entries with old identity card
numbers, which are lower.
By using a
query that would bring only the new entries that were not present in the 2004
RE the first surprise came when I found so many new entries that had low
Identity card numbers. I expected most new entries to have new ID numbers
around the 20,000,000 figure. But there were thousands with very low numbers,
and I mean very, very low as low as 10. Could it be that so many people had
never bothered to vote until now? Could all of them be beneficiaries of the
Misiones?
Here is a
sample of new voters with low id numbers that I found:
Nac.
|
Id
|
Name
|
Voting
Center
|
Date of
Birth
|
Age (2006)
|
V
|
10
|
RIERA
FORTIQUE GREGORIO JOSE
|
190502001
|
1886/12/08
|
120
|
V
|
14
|
PIMENTEL
PARILLI ENRIQUE
|
131601051
|
1894/07/24
|
112
|
V
|
37
|
ESTEVA
RIOS LINO GUILLERMO
|
10101008
|
1912/09/23
|
94
|
V
|
56
|
CONTRERAS
UNDA FELIPE
|
30601015
|
1911/11/11
|
95
|
V
|
66
|
SUAREZ
MANTILLA HERNAN
|
131901011
|
1916/07/25
|
90
|
V
|
88
|
CA-IZALES
VILLEGAS DARIO EDECIO
|
130102002
|
1918/02/18
|
88
|
V
|
111
|
HERNANDEZ
GARCIA RENE
|
191502001
|
1895/04/28
|
111
|
V
|
117
|
GONZALEZ
PADILLA ELOY GUILLERMO
|
101501001
|
1873/06/25
|
133
|
V
|
123
|
HERNANDEZ
GUTIERREZ MELECIO
|
71201016
|
1872/02/12
|
134
|
V
|
126
|
LUCIANI
LOERO ROBERTO
|
21401001
|
1895/02/14
|
111
|
V
|
134
|
MARCANO
BETANCOURT IGNACIO
|
70101006
|
1879/11/27
|
127
|
V
|
163
|
PEREZ
ALCANTARA FRANCISCO
|
120201002
|
1879/03/07
|
127
|
V
|
167
|
BARRIENTOS SANTIAGO
|
240111010
|
1909/05/23
|
97
|
V
|
176
|
MERCADO
RAMOS RAQUEL DE STURIK
|
190701006
|
1926/04/24
|
80
|
V
|
196
|
BOUQUET
HIDALGO JOSE ESTANISLAO
|
211803020
|
1906/10/12
|
100
|
V
|
222
|
DELIMA
DELIMA ANTONIO JOSE
|
160804003
|
1906/12/15
|
100
|
V
|
223
|
ARMADA
RODRIGUEZ ANTONIO
|
190506005
|
1898/04/08
|
108
|
V
|
231
|
MADRID
ROJAS ALFREDO
|
180501001
|
1883/02/14
|
123
|
V
|
552
|
MARTINEZ
OQUENDO RUBEN
|
21702002
|
1907/04/20
|
99
|
V
|
596
|
GIFFONI
CASTILLO FRANCISCO
|
130501011
|
1903/07/15
|
103
|
V
|
667
|
COBOS JUAN BAUTISTA
|
210605003
|
1903/08/29
|
103
|
V
|
731
|
LANDER
LUGO PEDRO TOMAS
|
190706001
|
1882/02/14
|
124
|
V
|
1010
|
SCANNONE
LAPADULA ANTONIO
|
201201010
|
1876/09/06
|
130
|
V
|
1223
|
PERNIA
CASIQUE NARCISO
|
240101012
|
1891/10/29
|
115
|
V
|
1263
|
CORDERO
SUTIL OSCAR
|
21401006
|
1895/05/17
|
111
|
V
|
1270
|
CARRASCO PEDRO
|
210901009
|
1883/05/19
|
123
|
V
|
1290
|
LEON
ARELLANO BUSTAMANTE ANTONIO JOSE
|
70301007
|
1908/09/13
|
98
|
V
|
1359
|
MATHEUS
FUENMAYOR FRANCISCO JOSE
|
130901111
|
1914/09/22
|
92
|
V
|
1467
|
RODRIGUEZ
GUEVARA OSCAR
|
190303004
|
1912/06/11
|
94
|
V
|
1474
|
RIVAS
SU-E HIPOLITA
|
50210005
|
1890/08/22
|
116
|
V
|
1486
|
ELIAS
PEREZ FRANCISCO
|
51001002
|
1924/11/02
|
82
|
V
|
1535
|
FLORES
HERNANDEZ ANTONIO
|
160301037
|
1900/08/24
|
106
|
V
|
1665
|
LANDAETA
CARRILLO DANIEL
|
60109004
|
1900/07/21
|
106
|
V
|
1713
|
CARBONELL
RAMOS NESTOR
|
131001010
|
1904/10/20
|
102
|
V
|
1765
|
FOMBONA
PACHANO JACINTO
|
51102002
|
1901/05/19
|
105
|
V
|
2080
|
DIAZ
ALONZO AURELIANO
|
130901096
|
1898/06/16
|
108
|
V
|
3245
|
MAIZO ACISCLO
|
150101006
|
1967/11/17
|
39
|
V
|
3333
|
HENRIQUEZ
CUBILLAN LUIS
|
211301001
|
1914/08/26
|
92
|
V
|
3407
|
LANDA
MORALES CARLOS ALBERTO
|
21401006
|
1901/09/16
|
105
|
V
|
3520
|
GARCIA
SUCRE LUIS ENRIQUE
|
131101032
|
1919/08/28
|
87
|
V
|
4343
|
CASTILLO
VILLASMIL RAFAEL ANGEL
|
10112003
|
1902/10/24
|
104
|
V
|
4364
|
STEINER
STEINER ESTEBAN RODOLFO
|
30601013
|
1906/12/09
|
100
|
V
|
4444
|
DELFINO
WILCKELMANN ALFREDO ELIAS
|
41701011
|
1891/07/20
|
115
|
V
|
5559
|
NOVELLINO
GARRIDO ITALO
|
211902002
|
1916/04/18
|
90
|
V
|
6999
|
GARCIA
DELEPIANI PEDRO JOSE
|
131501004
|
1904/02/22
|
102
|
V
|
9084
|
ALVARADO JUAN
|
121602001
|
1892/05/27
|
114
|
V
|
10000
|
VARGAS
CARDENAS MARIO RICARDO
|
210704005
|
1913/05/29
|
93
|
V
|
10104
|
GOMEZ
FIGUERA ANIBAL
|
120405001
|
1912/03/14
|
94
|
V
|
10168
|
LOPEZ FRANCISCO
|
180805002
|
1900/10/10
|
106
|
V
|
10467
|
ARISTEIGUIETA TORRES FELIPE
|
170903016
|
1885/05/01
|
121
|
But the
really big surprise came when I noted the ages. It had already been reported that
there were many entries in the RE of people older than 100 years old. Those can
easily be attributed to a carelessly maintained database where deceased were
not removed appropriately. But this is different, this are NEW ENTRIES! People
who were not registered to vote before 2004!
Here is a
sample of the 50 oldest NEW voters.
Nac.
|
Id
|
Name
|
Voting Center
|
Date of Birth
|
Age (2006)
|
V
|
1212277
|
ESPINOZA PEDRO JUAN
|
140706020
|
1870/06/29
|
136
|
V
|
22598
|
VARGAS JOAQUIN
|
80201012
|
1870/08/16
|
136
|
V
|
18728
|
ANDRADE SEGUNDO
|
130401023
|
1870/05/13
|
136
|
V
|
11291
|
SILVA
BLANCO JUAN BAUTISTA
|
211803020
|
1870/01/30
|
136
|
V
|
1572011
|
SANDOVAL
BARRIENTOS JOSE ANTONIO
|
211001001
|
1872/04/21
|
134
|
V
|
47594
|
CASANOVA
DE LOSSADA MARIA ANTONIA
|
210513015
|
1872/01/03
|
134
|
V
|
22645
|
MEZA MEZA
JOSE DE JESUS
|
180803009
|
1872/03/19
|
134
|
V
|
13048
|
DURAN
CHACON BENIGNO
|
110205006
|
1872/02/13
|
134
|
V
|
123
|
HERNANDEZ
GUTIERREZ MELECIO
|
71201016
|
1872/02/12
|
134
|
V
|
11892786
|
DOMINGUEZ
GUERRERO GLORIA BENITA
|
211401010
|
1873/07/18
|
133
|
V
|
18204
|
LAREYAH
DE CASES CADEN
|
140402005
|
1873/04/18
|
133
|
V
|
18016
|
MANZANILLA
RIVAS MANUEL MARIA
|
30101002
|
1873/09/07
|
133
|
V
|
17778
|
JIMENEZ
HERNANDEZ TIBURCIO
|
71401011
|
1873/03/22
|
133
|
V
|
117
|
GONZALEZ
PADILLA ELOY GUILLERMO
|
101501001
|
1873/06/25
|
133
|
V
|
20440996
|
OLIVERO
OLIVERO EDICSO SEGUNDO
|
211805009
|
1874/03/03
|
132
|
V
|
22120
|
MONTEVERDE
MAC-CLONG EDUARDO
|
211805013
|
1874/06/17
|
132
|
V
|
1012790
|
ESPINOZA
ABREU EDUVINO
|
191301004
|
1875/10/17
|
131
|
V
|
941366
|
MARTINEZ
DE HERNANDEZ MARIA GUILLERMINA ELO
|
240108004
|
1875/06/25
|
131
|
V
|
22640
|
GONZALEZ
PEREZ JESUS MARIA
|
180804005
|
1875/02/18
|
131
|
V
|
18741
|
SENIOR
LOPEZ HENRIQUEZ JACOBO ISAAC
|
210513001
|
1875/09/14
|
131
|
V
|
209582
|
LOPEZ
RODRIGUEZ ANA
|
20901006
|
1876/10/27
|
130
|
V
|
1010
|
SCANNONE
LAPADULA ANTONIO
|
201201010
|
1876/09/06
|
130
|
V
|
1371898
|
RIERA
ORTEGA RAMONA
|
212001005
|
1877/01/25
|
129
|
V
|
318567
|
ORAMAS
DELGADO PABLO
|
10104025
|
1877/06/18
|
129
|
V
|
174163
|
CARRERO MARIA SACRAMENTO
|
160601034
|
1877/09/06
|
129
|
V
|
195371
|
VALERO
BAEZ VICTOR
|
10107020
|
1878/12/23
|
128
|
V
|
174340
|
SALAZAR
CACERES CONCEPCION
|
160801018
|
1878/06/06
|
128
|
V
|
18374
|
PEREZ DE
RODRIGUEZ ISABEL
|
210303009
|
1878/11/08
|
128
|
V
|
15954
|
VASQUEZ
MELENDEZ RENATO
|
220104001
|
1878/09/20
|
128
|
V
|
14137
|
ANDERSON
GARCIA MANUEL
|
211805023
|
1878/01/13
|
128
|
V
|
14103036
|
QUINTERO
CAMACHO YIRELYS YELITZA
|
70801008
|
1879/07/19
|
127
|
V
|
14015657
|
DIAZ
RAMOS YSMERYS DEL VALLE
|
10111013
|
1879/04/04
|
127
|
V
|
12384486
|
ROYER
ESPINOZA ROMA MICHELE
|
40107014
|
1879/06/10
|
127
|
V
|
11552731
|
MEDINA
CARVAJAL DAYDEE MILAGROS
|
130901059
|
1879/12/15
|
127
|
V
|
10847209
|
ZAMBRANO
HERNANDEZ HUMBERTO GREGORIO
|
110202023
|
1879/03/24
|
127
|
V
|
10727961
|
BOZA QUEVEDO
FELIDICTA MARGOT
|
160301001
|
1879/07/09
|
127
|
V
|
10560837
|
ARIAS SELENNE ISABEL
|
50207006
|
1879/07/18
|
127
|
V
|
1004406
|
BRICE-O
PEREZ JOSE IGNACIO
|
230101002
|
1879/11/06
|
127
|
V
|
725563
|
GONZALEZ BARTOLO
|
10118003
|
1879/08/10
|
127
|
V
|
23232
|
SEMAH
VALENCIA LOPEZ PE-A JULIA DELIA
|
10101010
|
1879/01/03
|
127
|
V
|
18183
|
VELASQUEZ BORRA MATIAS
|
130401021
|
1879/02/24
|
127
|
V
|
163
|
PEREZ
ALCANTARA FRANCISCO
|
120201002
|
1879/03/07
|
127
|
V
|
134
|
MARCANO
BETANCOURT IGNACIO
|
70101006
|
1879/11/27
|
127
|
V
|
24369789
|
FERNANDEZ MONTI
MINERVA
|
210203002
|
1880/11/02
|
126
|
V
|
21087130
|
CASTILLO
PEREZ NELSON
|
220103001
|
1880/07/06
|
126
|
V
|
19181123
|
QUEIPO
SALAS SONIA DEL CARMEN
|
80101004
|
1880/08/13
|
126
|
V
|
19108503
|
PIEDRAHITA
VIVEROS ELISA
|
70203013
|
1880/02/02
|
126
|
V
|
14230500
|
SOTO
GALINDEZ YAQUELIN ROSMARY
|
40108007
|
1880/07/14
|
126
|
V
|
14015246
|
MARIN PEREZ
YESENIA CAROLINA
|
110203003
|
1880/05/17
|
126
|
V
|
11092813
|
DELGADO FELIX ANTONIO
|
40601004
|
1880/10/06
|
126
|
What does it mean?
Some of
the impossibly old ages could be attributed to typographical errors while
registering new voters due to the sloppy and rushed process of the Mision
Identidad (like in the case of FERNANDEZ
MONTI MINERVA CI: V-24,369,789
DOB 1879/11/27)
But that
explanation falls short when considering someone with ID numbers V-10 or V-14
or V-117 or V-123. How did their information find its way into the RE. They
didn’t register themselves, we know that much. That information could only have
come from the ONI-DEX, the government agency in charge of issuing the Identity
cards and could only have been entered into the RE by someone in the CNE as
they are the sole custodians of that database. This is incontrovertible proof
that the RE was tampered by the CNE.
How important is it?
How much
damage can a couple of thousand deceased cause?
The fact
is that we don’t know how many people were added fraudulently into the
database. What made it obvious in this case is their impossibly old ages, but
there could be hundreds of thousands more for all we know.
Look at
the distribution of new voters based on their ages (only Venezuelans):
Less than 20
|
143,122
|
between 20 and 29
|
1,762,709
|
between 30 and 39
|
525,913
|
between 40 and 49
|
140,263
|
between 50 and 59
|
78,957
|
between 60 and 69
|
32,600
|
between 70 and 79
|
11,284
|
between 80 and 89
|
2,341
|
between 90 and 99
|
461
|
between 100 and 109
|
619
|
between 110 and 119
|
175
|
between 120 and 129
|
163
|
between 130 and 139
|
22
|
Total
|
2,698,629
|
And based
on their ID card numbers (only Venezuelans):
less than 1,000,000
|
983
|
between 1,000,000 and 1,999,999
|
1,191
|
between 2,000,000 and 2,999,999
|
1,298
|
between 3,000,000 and 3,999,999
|
1,312
|
between 4,000,000 and 4,999,999
|
1,557
|
between 5,000,000 and 5,999,999
|
3,274
|
between 6,000,000 and 6,999,999
|
12,654
|
between 7,000,000 and 7,999,999
|
12,968
|
between 8,000,000 and 8,999,999
|
14,625
|
between 9,000,000 and 9,999,999
|
23,455
|
between 10,000,000 and 10,999,999
|
50,395
|
between 11,000,000 and 11,999,999
|
83,752
|
between 12,000,000 and 12,999,999
|
126,160
|
between 13,000,000 and 13,999,999
|
157,665
|
between 14,000,000 and 14,999,999
|
194,420
|
between 15,000,000 and 15,999,999
|
290,386
|
between 16,000,000 and 16,999,999
|
395,826
|
between 17,000,000 and 17,999,999
|
462,864
|
between 18,000,000 and 18,999,999
|
301,823
|
between 19,000,000 and 19,999,999
|
117,330
|
between 20,000,000 and 20,999,999
|
46,998
|
between 21,000,000 and 21,999,999
|
38,314
|
between 22,000,000 and 22,999,999
|
213,110
|
between 23,000,000 and 23,999,999
|
80,901
|
between 24,000,000 and 24,999,999
|
59,511
|
between 25,000,000 and 25,999,999
|
5,857
|
|
|
On the
other hand if they added deceased people, what would stop them from adding
non-existent people with new ID card numbers? Remember Mision Identidad? That may
explain why the CNE doesn’t want to release the voters addresses, virtual
voters simply don’t have real addresses.But why do it?
In 2004
Chavez started the ‘Misiones’ and he desperately needed to show enough new
voters to be able to swing the result. My guess is they didn’t get as many new voters
as he needed, so they started creating new ones. The same seems to be happening
now when Chavez boasts about winning the December elections with 10,000,000
votes, which is a ridiculous figure. Considering what he allegedly got in the
RR after all the tricks and manipulations.
By adding
their own virtual voters they can ensure a minimum of votes whenever they need
them as long as the ballots are not counted. Also, by inflating the RE the CNE
can make any result hard to audit because anything that falls outside the
historical pattern can always be argued saying that is because of all the new
voters that are in favor of Chavez.
This makes
it so much clearer why the CNE doesn’t want a thorough audit of the RE. This is
really incriminating evidence. If this much can be found by a few individuals
working in their free time, just imagine what a team of dedicated specialists may
find.