A tale of two oil companies

July 22, 2009

(Este post está en español aquí)

Two or three weeks ago, PDVSA came out with a zero coupon bond the so called Petrobono 2011. It sold it to locals who, eager for foreign currency, bid low for the bonds. The process was full of missteps and errors, PDVSA only placed US$ 1,4 billion out of the planned US$ 3 billion and had to go through a second round selling the bond mostly to local banks as a hedge against the devaluation of the swap exchange market. Even today, two weeks afterwards, the Petrobono 2011 trades in the grey market (The company has failed to register yet in the international markets) at 66% of its face value, an equivalent yield of 25.8% for the two year bond and way above the 18.75% of the PDVSA 2017 issue.

This week,  Ecopetrol, Colombia’s state oil company, a much smaller company than PDVSA, issued US$ 1.5 billion in a new 10 year bond at 99.6%, which gives a yield to maturity of 7.625% and by today that bond was at 103% of its value for a yield to maturity of 7.25%.

Two completely different paths for mighty PDVSA and much smaller Colombian counterpart, a reflection of the disparate ways the two companies are being run. It cost PDVSA, a company with higher oil reserves, revenues and earnings than Ecopetrol, a full 10% more to finance itself, expensive, even for the oil business.

The difference? While Ecopetrol has been given more independence and opened itself to private investment, PDVSA has done exactly the opposite. Ecopetrol placed 10% of its shares in the Colombian Stock Market as a way of forcing management to pay attention to the shareholders. At the same time, the company has opened fields to private investments and oil production is up. PDVSA on the other hand is being run as part of the Government, oil production is down and the company is being run inefficiently for the benefit of the Government and not the shareholders. (The people of Venezuela)

And while many think PDVSA does not deserve the large spread between its yield and that Ecopetrol (I think it’s exaggerated) it is the result of the lack of transparency and incompetent way in which the company is being run. Because while Ecopetrol issued the bond to have more money for growth, PDVSA just needed local currency to pay overdue bills, as it now produces oil, makes homes, owns supermarkets and imports food.

Even more ironic is the fact that while former PDVSA employees are banned and blacklisted by the Chavez Government, from working in the oil sector in Venezuela, at least three companies formed by these employees are actively participating in the expansion of the Colombian oil sector, servicing fields, exploring and producing oil.

It is in short, a very graphic glimpse of the difference in the two directions the two countries have been going in the last ten years. Ecopetrol chose the Petrobras model, PDVSA has been pushed into an impossible path of self-destruction. While hundreds of projects brought to market by Ecopetrol in the last ten years have found partners and investors, we await once again for PDVSA to close the first new project in the ten years of the Chavez era, but we suspect it will be delayed once again.

And any day that goes buy without PDVSA adding new production will eventually mean additional misery to the people of Venezuela, who could benefit from the additional investment, the lower financing costs and the closer supervision of their main asset: PDVSA.

But PDVSA belongs to Ramirez and Chavez and has become Roja, Rojita and at the service of politics rather than at the promotion of the prosperity of all Venezuelans. Because while at times PDVSA has disbursed lots of funds for social programs, it is no longer doing that as it has become the source of petty cash for Chavez’ pet international projects, promoter extraordinaire of businesses that have nothing to do with its core oil business and which only benefit of the deep pockets and infrastructure of the company.

It is indeed the tale of two oil companies, the tale of two countries, the tale of two different strategies, only one of which will bring prosperity to its owners. But even more foolishly, the path taken by Ecopetrol is the only path of success ever taken by oil companies anywhere in the world. Meanwhile, PDVSA has been taken in an unproven path, led by inexperienced managers and technicians who improvise and invent at every step of the way, leading the company into its own self-destruction.

15 Responses to “A tale of two oil companies”

  1. […] Malcriadez de Chavez #666: Hugo congela relaciones con Colombia Julio 29, 2009 (This post in English here) […]

  2. […] Lanzacohetes venezolanos econtrados en manos de la FARC Julio 28, 2009 (This post in English here) […]

  3. […] Guerra a la Venezolana por Laureano Marquez Julio 27, 2009 (This post in English here) […]

  4. […] Cuando la llegada de un barco cargado de azucar es noticia en Venezuela Julio 27, 2009 (This post in English here) […]

  5. […] Washington planifica un “jaque mate” a Hugo Chavez de acuerdo a Heinz Dieterich Julio 26, 2009 (This post in English here) […]

  6. […] Concurso: Ley o reglamento más estúpido emitido por la revolución boba Julio 24, 2009 (This post in English here) […]

  7. GWEH Says:

    bueno Miguel PDVSA is prospecting for oil in Ecuador and Cuba!

  8. moctavio Says:

    I don’t know relative to the size of the economy, but Revenues were 77 billion, profits were like 15 (twice PDVSA!) Assets 200 billion.


    They are in Argentina, Sudan, Moznabique, Thailand, Vietnam, Gabon….

    Company owns tallest buildings i the world… (trivia)

    sole sharholder the Government, not a bad job…

  9. Andres F. Says:

    Your Malaysian example sounds interesting, but does oil revenue in Malaysia represent a large share of their country’s revenue? Have they lived decades of easy wealth?
    I believe knowing how to run a company is very significant, but I also believe the devil’s excrement goes beyond this ability. I believe easy wealth creates economic and social chaos, for most underdeveloped countries.

  10. […] El cuento de dos empresas petroleras Julio 24, 2009 (This post in English here) […]

  11. moctavio Says:

    Run differently, they would benefit, but I see your skepticism. Personally, I think PDVSA should be run like an international oil company, looking for oil everywhere it can, not as a “we have the oil, come and get it operation” . My example is Malasya which has an extraordinary oil company with only 800,000 barrels a day of its own production. Of course, it would take years now to execute that, as PDVSA lost the technical expertise that was key to something like that.

  12. Douglas Novo Says:

    Because lets face it. That is the only exploitable resource Venezuela has that can take it out of its banana republic status. I know it sounds trite but we must make a Norway/Canada out of our Latin Iran/Iraq in terms of the handling of the oil resource. The fact that the “devil’s excrement” has proven to be right for most of the 90 odd years of oil exploitation in Venezuela does not necessarily mean it must be so for the next 90. When will be learn that?. Its hard to tell but its doable.

  13. Andres F Says:

    If the devil’s excrement is the sure path to failure, how/why would the people of Venezuela benefit from the survival of their “main asset: PDVSA”?

  14. Douglas Novo Says:

    Back in the mid seventies, we were so proud of the fact that the newly created PDVSA was to be managed more as a private company. The terrible consequences of state political meddling had been so painfully shown in the administration of the petrochemical industry, the telecommunications industry, the steel industry, the cement industry….you see the point. We saw the benefits as Venezuela looked so much better in handling this that the other OPEC countries with their national behemoths.
    In the eighties that farsighted policy began to fray at the edges as succeeding administrations pressured PDVSA to save them from themselves on each succeeding economic crisis by depriving them of the financial means to be a healthy long-term thinking organization as any major oil company must be.
    In the nineties the unrelenting fiscal pressure drove PDVSA and the government to embrace private investment as a means to create more productions and deliver more fiscal resources to the government. The so called “apertura petrolera” went against the loop-sided nationalistic and manipulative grain of Venezuelan politics but it created more opportunities for all the parties involved, including the Venezuelan worker.
    In the early part of the 21st century we have gone around to the worst possible model we sought to avoid and are already seen the consequences of seeking political control as a means to an end that does not include the welfare of the country and its people.
    It seems that we must hit bottom, run out of options, and out of desperation retake more sane policies for a new more enlightened policy to take hold. I just hope that the trained and experienced management is there to take on the challenge. I am personally feeling less optimistic as each day passes.

  15. Alex Dalmady Says:

    That’s a really good post, Diablo.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: